Voice referendum would be ‘dead and buried already’ if Libs had a coherent stance earlier

preview_player
Показать описание
The Voice to Parliament referendum would be “dead and buried already” if the Liberal party had a coherent stance on the Voice earlier, says Sky News host Rita Panahi.

“We’ve had almost ten months of the Voice having a free run, just a few conservative commentators asking questions – but the overwhelming majority of the media, of the corporate world, of the sporting codes, all the celebrities – everyone’s been pushing it, and you look at those poll numbers from Roy Morgan, and it’s already in trouble,” Ms Panahi said.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

It flies in the face of equal representation for all. Certain demographic groups get special considertion at the expense of the majority...

grantsapain
Автор

This indigenous Australian will be voting No

tazbatik
Автор

Ambiguous changes to constitutional land rights?
'The Voice' will inevitably open the dam walls on a plethora of Native Title claims which will result in every property owner in Australia having to pay rent.
It will be a rent tax. It means every Australian home owner and landlord will pay an extra tax (rent tax).
They say we are on stolen land and therefore you are 'renters' a sign of goodwill to pay extra tax.
It will depend on the value of your home. If you have say a 1.5 million house in Sydney you will probably pay .5 to 1% rent tax meaning >5 to 10k per year.
Landlords will simply increase rent for tenants to cover the cost.
Where will this money go? It will feed a bureaucracy.
New developments will also pay extra fees to develop on 'stolen land’.

chpsk
Автор

No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No

Now stop spending our Taxes like a drunken sailor Albo and maybe fix the hospitals like you campaigned on .

wilowest
Автор

Bottom line is: who’s convinced that the Voice will solve the aborigini problems?

winnielai
Автор

It’s all about race and entitlement. Vote no.

scottlewisparsons
Автор

The Solicitors General’s advice to the PM maybe be such but completely collapses under the weight of just two words that can be found in the wording of Voice Referendum proposition.
The Parliament can “Grant Powers” to the Voice Body.
A wise consideration about the voice is to consider not what they tell you the voice will become today but what the voice has the potential to become tomorrow when the constitution has been amended.
In New Zealand the Voice Body in the beginning was to be just an advisory body with no power of veto.
In New Zealand 12 years later the Voice Body was granted and obtained a power of veto.
Never trust a politician for what they say because politicians can never be held accountable for what they say.
When the future for the Voice is not clear and when a future parliament can grant powers to Australia’s Voice Body-don’t trust it so just vote “NO”.
🇦🇺💯%

barryjulianwaldron
Автор

Dutton shouldn’t have sat on the fence for so long. The fact it took him so long to come out and just say NO from the start, he might be more popular i am hoping he beats AnAl at the next election. At least he won’t go on a 12 month world tour, make himself look like a W⚓️ dressing up in a NSW Blues Jersey and claim to be the “Captain”, and he won’t attempt to destroy Australia and our way of life like Air Bus AnAl has 🤓

Cobber
Автор

And so it should be. Racial Division is utterly disgusting and we should all vote NO 👈

bigbopper
Автор

I believe the voice is nothing more than a sham to keep tight control of the Aboriginal community. Pick a few who will toe the line you want them to, give them a little power/prestige so they are indebted to you and use them to stifle any dissent/demands from the grass roots members of the said community. They can funnel any complaints/requests through those they have selected and they can take the heat that would normally be directed at the govt and the pollies can say "look at what we did for the Aboriginal people. I believe this is why they are so afraid of Jacinta Price, she sees all Australians and doesn't appear to be all about segregating us by race and only focus on one group.

haruchai
Автор

Two companies will profit from an ongoing land tax paid to so called indigenous Australians. They are Dan Murphy's and Toyota 😂😂😂

bigbopper
Автор

If that's true they don't need it in constitution then

davidcruse
Автор

With hundreds of different aboriginal groups you need hundreds of representatives to have an accurate “voice”. The “voice” is clearly designed to ignore aborigines not listen to them.

ArthurHugo
Автор

Rowan, If Peter Dutton wins the next election, will he do a Scott Morrison and just sit on his hands?

barrywalsh
Автор

There is no Funding for the no campaign rowan dean

leeklein
Автор

THE VOICE IS NOT GOOD FOR THIS COUNTRY FOR MANY REASONS IF YOU NO TO THE VOICE IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND IT VOTE NO JUST THE NO TO THE VOICE TO BAD

dominicgalante
Автор

It's going to be too late and you know it

vivrowe
Автор

😂😂😂😂😂
No one listens to the LNP anymore

bobhawke
Автор

Between Sky pushing the Woke Trans Barry Humphreys death and the Woke Voice vote I'm not even surprised to see a Trans man presenting this show anymore.

killbotone
Автор

Rita pretending right wing policies could be popular.
Well, they aren't Rita.
That's why you spend so much time talking about Harry and Megs, the green M&M's sexy boots disappearing and the constant trans attack!

bobhawke