Customizing HttpStatusCode.Conflict Response in ASP.NET Core Web API

Learn how to customize validation responses in ASP.NET Core Web API to send `409 Conflict` status codes using the ValidationResult method.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: ValidationResult to send 409 conflict status code ASP.NET Core Web Api

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Customizing HTTP Status Code Responses in ASP.NET Core Web API

When building a Web API using ASP.NET Core, you might run into a situation where the default validation responses do not meet your application needs. By default, when validation fails, the API responds with an HttpStatusCode.BadRequest (400). However, there are instances where you may want to return an HttpStatusCode.Conflict (409) instead. This guide will guide you through how to modify the behavior of your API to send a 409 Conflict status code when validation results are not met.

Understanding the Problem

The Default Behavior

In many scenarios, validation logic is implemented using data annotations in ASP.NET Core. While it is helpful to have automatic validation of incoming model states, the default response of 400 Bad Request may not accurately reflect the situation you're trying to address. For example, if a system encounters a business logic conflict, 409 Conflict is a more meaningful response.

Why Use 409 Conflict?

Using 409 Conflict is effective for scenarios where the request conflicts with the state of the resource. For instance, if a user tries to create a resource that already exists or violates some constraint, returning 409 can signal that the request cannot be fulfilled due to a conflict with the current state.

Solution: Customizing the Validation Response

Step-by-Step Implementation

Modify the Configure Services Method: Within the ConfigureServices method, configure the API behavior options to handle invalid model states.

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation of the Code:

InvalidModelStateResponseFactory: This is a factory method that allows you to customize what happens when model validation fails.

ValidationProblemDetails: This object carries the details about the validation error, and we are setting its Status property to 409.

UnprocessableEntityObjectResult: This is the response type we are using to send back the conflict status along with validation issue details.

Conclusion: Test and Verify

After you’ve made these changes, be sure to test your API. You should now receive 409 Conflict status codes when validation issues arise that you want to convey as conflicts. This customization makes your API responses more meaningful and helps clients understand the exact nature of validation failures.

Summary

In summary, by customizing the response for validation failures in your ASP.NET Core Web API, you can provide clearer communication regarding conflicts that arise from invalid data submissions. Making use of HttpStatusCode.Conflict (409) can significantly enhance the usability and clarity of your API.

By implementing the steps outlined above, you have transformed the default 400 Bad Request responses into more appropriate 409 Conflict responses that accurately represent the situation at hand.

For further assistance or inquiries about your ASP.NET Core projects, feel free to explore the vast array of resources available or reach out to the community for support.