Can a Spark suck Electricity from the Earth?

Thanks for watching. Please LIKE, SHARE, COMMENT and SUBSCRIBE
╔═╦╗╔╦╗╔═╦═╦╦╦╦╗╔═╗
║╚╣║║║╚╣╚╣╔╣╔╣║╚╣═╣
╠╗║╚╝║║╠╗║╚╣║║║║║═╣
╚═╩══╩═╩═╩═╩╝╚╩═╩═╝

Why are we paying for electricity when it's free? Have you ever wondered if free energy exists? It is clear that our ambient atmosphere is fully loaded with electrons and ions, made evident by the millions of lightning strikes around the world happening every minute of the day. Can we harness these atmospheric electrons?

Excess-energy electrons in the vacuum of a common house hold incandescent bulb. The bulb is similar to a cold cathode tube type device in which photo-ionization in a vacuumed out bulb provided by a corona discharge causes a photoelectric effect to take place and an ELECTRON AVALANCHE ensues. ref .(Townsend Avalanche)

In simple terms, look at the small tiny little HV spark and light entering the bulb and compare it to the obviously much bigger sparks and amount of light inside of the bulb. What would you call this? We postulate that they are indeed extra-energy-electrons. Let us form together to learn the ways of how to capture this free energy space charge.

As you may or may not know, or have heard, that the earth is basically a giant capacitor, in which the ground is the negative plate, and the sky is the positive plate, while the air acts as an insulator. Negative and positive Electrostatic fields build up between the Earth's ground and sky, and an ion trail is formed between the two. When the two connect, boom! you have a brilliant and giant electric spark.

It is a scientifically known fact that there are electrons, or electricity, and ions, in the air along with various other gases such as nitrogen, oxygen, argon, helium, methane and water vapor.

It is also scientifically known that a process exists, that creates an anomalous, energy, amplification, called an, electron avalanche. An electron avalanche is a process in which an electric field causes an acceleration of the free electrons in a medium such as the air.

Nikola Tesla originally invented the once popular 1980's novelty item, the plasma globe, while experimenting with high voltage and high-frequency currents in a tube with the air vacuumed out of it for studying purposes. He called it an inert gas discharge tube.

Although it is just the excitation of the gas molecules or even the vacuum inside of the bulb, do think this represents actual energy? Do you think that there is more energy inside the bulb than there is at the input where the small spark is located?

After all, we do know for a fact that light is energy because it is a vibrational high frequency, and we also know that heat is a vibrational energy as well, although we do not know at this time how much actual heat is in this simple experiment. Which do you think hurts the worse, the bigger and thicker plasma discharges at the output or the smaller spark at the input?

Thanks for watching, and as usual, please Like, Share, Comment and Subscribe.

[rootfukushima]

ENERGY IS FREE BUT "Those in charge" NOT WANT US TO KNOW SO "those in charge " CAN CARRY OUT THEIR AGENDA

[-fv]

The nature is free and connected electric charges... by rubbing all the known materials, we can measure directly, the electric charges coming out of them.
Definition of energy is incomplete as it is directly justified by the following incomplete definitions.