Traefik vs. Nginx performance benchmark

preview_player
Показать описание

▬▬▬▬▬ Experience & Location 💼 ▬▬▬▬▬
► I’m a Senior Software Engineer at Juniper Networks (12+ years of experience)
► Located in San Francisco Bay Area, CA (US citizen)

▬▬▬▬▬▬ Connect with me 👋 ▬▬▬▬▬▬

▬▬▬▬▬▬ Related videos 👨‍🏫 ▬▬▬▬▬▬

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ Source Code 📚 ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

#Nginx #Traefik #DevOps
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This is why Nginx is the undisputed King for superior performance with minimum resource utilization.

Openspeedtest
Автор

recently i started getting your videos recommended. they are very interesting indeed. keep up the good work!

javohirmirzo
Автор

The best, or even the only real, comparison video I found on yt. 🙏🙏🙏
Nice testing protcol.

blender_wiki
Автор

Your videos are really great. Keep up the good work!🔥

yabokunokami
Автор

Very interesting to see the performance difference, thanks for making this video

kingsathurthi
Автор

Thanks, really like your videos. Would appreciate a comparison with haproxy next time

Nick-ydrc
Автор

Thank you for sharing these well designed tests - am learning a lot!

samelie
Автор

Te amo, este es el tipo de preguntas que quería resolver <3. Gracias por este contenido

danielviloria
Автор

Годно, спасибо!

Было очевидно, что nginx – это слишком мощный и хорошо написанный инструмент, повторить его результаты на языках с gc почти невозможно. Буду использовать это видео как аргумент 😊

КириллКириллович
Автор

Hi, Thanks, I like your videos. Would appreciate a comparison with Traefik vs Caddy 2 next time

picatchumm
Автор

Interesting, I used apache (httpd) as a reverse proxy, historically mostly, interesting how would it compare.
And such surprising results for grpc, I would never guess it can be this way. Although I’m wandering wether the actual backend service implementation could affect the results somehow. Don’t see any legitimate reason for proxies to behave this way.
I can see the request time much longer for grpc, so longer lasting connections could possibly consume more resources on the proxy side. It seems the answer may be in the app. I think so. Backend analysis might help to figure out.
Although in general I surprised how poorly the grpc system behaves. I thought it’s kinda the holy grail for the low latency systems. I would definitely appreciate more in depth analysis of the topic.

kamurashev
Автор

great! would like to see benchmark about envoy proxy

dgjtf
Автор

Thanks for the video. I do like traefik for the simple fact it's a bit more noob friendly when using with kubernetes

Phyxu
Автор

I just want to say thank you for these very interesting videos. I want you to know that you've been helping me improve in my career and get better jobs. Thank you sir! (I'm subbed!)

alts
Автор

When you say "HTTP/1" here do you really mean 1.0 without keepalive or 1.1 with keepalive? And from the client perspective, do we actually close socket each time?

Taurdil
Автор

Great video, thank you :)


Could I consider the NGINX performance the same as the NGINX Proxy Manager (NPM)?

JRRRRRRRRRRR
Автор

How is traefik different from envoyproxy? I know it's a fork of envoy but is it designed for edge proxy?

nootajay
Автор

Does anyone know how an envoy based reverse proxy compares? I think of something like contour

LampJustin
Автор

Traefik API GW Installation guide, websocket support required 💐

sunilkumar-xpjz
Автор

what benchmarking platform do you use?

stephen.cabreros