Karine Jean-Pierre Laughs After Being Asked If George Santos Is Invited To The White House

preview_player
Показать описание
On Monday, Karine Jean-Pierre held a White House Press Briefing and was asked about an upcoming White House reception for new members of Congress.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

Stay Connected
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

After all this - Santos is still in Congress & taxpayers are paying him a salary.

wolfmangoland
Автор

It's shocking Republican lawmakers like Greene, McCarthy, Gaetz are supporting George Santos
even though Republican supporters are not.

jayh
Автор

He'd have to drag out a suitable outfit for such a visit.

petercristo
Автор

the way everyone started laughing sent meee…how has he not resigned? he must be unable to feel shame

tfh
Автор

forbes breaking news? *hide from timeline*

jonathancoates
Автор

Why do these reporters waste their time, SHE NEVER HAS ANSWERS FOR ANYTHING 🙄

Zhana
Автор

Can Someone ask Karine Jean-Pierre what most of the Constituents would love to know. If Constituents are the reason that there is a White House, Congress, and Government. Why are Constituents put on criminal alerts if they address the Public Officials who are supposed to help the Constituents. It does not make any sense that all of these laws and fundings would be only for the Politicians, the Congress, and the Government. Why would Constituents be considered a threat to the People who are suppose to help them and address serious County public felonies in a timely manner. I have not seen too many People make much sense in that department. If the People are the reason for change and without People there will not be anything to change. How is it possible that the People who have more than enough evidence and have more than enough reasonable reasons to want responses to publicly published false accusations in their name the threats. These unlawful lawless outlaws has to make sense. The troublemakers cannot just make up stuff that does not add up and expect the ones who has been greatly affected believe that it is their faults for People who know better not giving Americans real Court hearings and real outcomes when the People involved presented their evidence to a Judge. It has NEVER made sense to research under Judges duties that it is unethical, criminal, and against the law to help troublemakers draw out a case long-term in cases like Union contracts and settled agreements when the agreements are already in place and call that no finding of fault. What would several Court dates be for when neither Party can change what is already in place. How does these kind of truth make Americans a criminal threat to Public Officials. These reckless accusations have to make sense. Public Officials cannot just say People that are supposed to ask for bills to be passed in their Districts and settled cases to be moved forward are to be watched and make People that I personally do not know or rush to meet more important than my justice and compensation. How does that equal being a threat to the People who should have been handled these matters. It does not take years to address transparency. My response will be if I was a Politician, worked in Congress, or the local Government is that burglary, larceny, and contracts were all violated and move the People along within thirty days. There would not be any reason to call an American with that kind of evidence a threat, give a fake trial, and have the audacity to push my luck further and claim the Person is a threat for wanting to be away from me if I was a Politician, worked in Congress, or for the local Government. Can we start making sense and STOP wasting time. Try asking questions like that. Start answering questions like that. Thanks for sharing

tcalip
Автор

Has she ever actually answer a single question?

bvierville
Автор

His autobiography is titled "based on a fale story"

ronaldcole
Автор

Lmao every week they just have her mumble and not answer any question up front, gotta love it !

josephrios
Автор

Completely insane 3 hours to fly Moscow to New York

alexsavard
Автор

Yes, he will be the headliner entertainment as– MISS KITARA RAVACHE!!! aaaah applaud applaud– reporters all stand for ovation!

TheGothicdolphin
Автор

Another day of avoiding tough questions

DontTreadOnMe
Автор

So for political reasons they will invite him anyway.

I remember when the Republicans had backbone and wouldn't invite a slimeball to break bread with them regardless of the Optics but now they themselves have become the Slime balls

TruckTaxiMoveIt
Автор

"Is George Santos invited?"
"We would have to look into expanding the budget to replace silverware prior to considering that."

eyebrid
Автор

They need to “George Santos” proof the White House...what a clown that guy is

mateotinoco
Автор

As far as I know santos is way more successful then this lady who calls out other people who are way more successful she is not good for country

vikingraider
Автор

I'm completely amazed at why some people watch different networks just to complain, you get what you get on the network you
Get a LIFE!!!

rltpalwaysrltpalways
Автор

She has NO Useful info. and they laughed because they KNOW this.

nothingnobody
Автор

George Santos is attending for sure, I know it coz I'm George Santos.

lorenzopinto