McConnell: 'Overwhelming Precedent' to Vote on SCOTUS Pick Before Election

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell affirmed that the Senate would go ahead with a vote on President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee and suggested it could be done before Election Day.

McConnell didn’t commit to meeting Trump’s requested deadline of a confirmation by Nov. 3. But he dismissed claims that there wasn’t enough time to confirm a nominee that quickly. He cited the confirmation of Justice John Paul Stevens in 1975, which took 19 days, and pointed out that the process for the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg took 42 days.

Stevens could have been confirmed “twice between now and Nov. 3, with time to spare,” McConnell said. “The Senate has more that sufficient time to process a nomination. History and precedent make that perfectly clear.”

Ginsburg died Friday of complications from cancer. Trump said Monday that he planned to nominate a replacement by Friday or Saturday. He said he is considering as many as five candidates, but people familiar with the matter said Trump is moving toward naming Amy Coney Barrett, a federal appellate court judge. He urged the Senate to put the new justice on the bench before the elections that will decide control of the White House and Congress.

“I’d much rather have a vote before the election because there’s a lot of work to be done,” he told reporters Monday. “We have plenty of time to do it.”

Proceeding with the vetting, hearings and confirmation in less than 40 days would be an unusual feat, though two justices in modern times, Stevens and Sandra Day O’Connor in 1981, were confirmed in shorter spans. The average confirmation process in that period took about 70 days.

Senator John Cornyn of Texas, a senior member of the Judiciary Committee and an adviser to McConnell, said whether or not a new Supreme Court nominee could be confirmed before the election depends on who is selected. If it’s a Circuit Court judge it could go faster, he added.

“If it’s someone who has been that’s just been confirmed to the Circuit Court and been through the FBI and ABA investigation -- who we know a lot about in other words -- then it could be done more expeditiously,” Cornyn said.

Trump’s statement escalated pressure on McConnell and Senate Republicans at a time when they are on the defensive in a closely contested election that could turn control of their chamber over to Democrats.

Holding what’s likely to be rancorous confirmation hearings and a vote to replace Ginsburg before the election could tie up crucial time that could otherwise be spent campaigning. It also would force endangered incumbents in swing states to cast a contentious vote before Election Day.

Senate Republicans currently control the chamber 53-47 and there are 10 GOP-held Senate seats that are considered competitive. Democrats already had a slight edge in their drive to take control of the Senate for the first time in six years and they are using the confirmation battle to pressure vulnerable Republicans.

Trump argued Monday that pressing ahead would aid the Republican candidates. “I think it’s going to help everybody,” he said on Fox News. “I think it would be good for everybody to get it over with because it’s always controversial,” he said.

McConnell can proceed once he’s certain that at least 50 Republicans are on board. Two GOP senators, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska and Susan Collins of Maine, have said they oppose going through with confirmation before the election. If two more Republican senators take the same stand, McConnell wouldn’t be able to bring the nomination to a vote.

QUICKTAKE ON SOCIAL:

QuickTake by Bloomberg is a global news network delivering up-to-the-minute analysis on the biggest news, trends and ideas for a new generation of leaders.

[tc]

Title is total distortion. This isn't the first time we've voted for a justice during an election year. 29! 29 times we've done it in the past.

[antoniobrown]

Just be fair and honest...it's not that hard! Most of us humans do it everyday 😤

[cameronj]

I’m old enough to remember Moscow Mitch say let the people decide in a election year!!

[alejandroganem]

Literally the most disgusting human of our Senate. Evil beyond compare.

[garysantos]

Republican leaders have shown blatant disregard of their sworn duty openly violated their Oath of Office.
“To do impartial justice according to the Constitution and laws: so, help me, God.”

And again, Mitch McConnell has said numerous times:
“The American people should have a voice in the selection of their next Supreme Court justice. Therefore, this vacancy should not be filled until we have a new president.” Feb. 13. 2016

“Rarely does a Supreme Court vacancy occur in the final year of a presidential term … Given that we are in the midst of the presidential election process, we believe that the American people should seize the opportunity to weigh in.” Feb. 18, 2016

[michaelhapgood]

It is sad that so many people do not understand the Constitution. It is the Presidents responsibility to nominate a candidate for the court. It is the Senates job to confirm, and consent. It is up to the majority leader when he wants to do that. Elections have consequences. as I heard obama say many times. That's how the game is played boys and girls

[dkchen]

Love how they don't show the whole speech because it would make Democrats and the liberal media look stupid.

[rayt.]

People, it is the Senate's job to fill the vacancy. Let them do their job. Stop complaining.

[Smullet]

Honestly if you don't like it then you should win more seats. 🤷‍♀️