Is Junk DNA Useless??

============================

Follow us on Facebook, Instagram and Twitter:

Visit other Youtube channels connected to the Center for Science & Culture

[jakeyost]

Who was stupid enough to say “98% of dna is junk” instead of “I can’t figure out what 98% of dna is doing” some people are just so caught up in one track thinking. That just goes against every principle of science and common sense

[imofage]

Dollars to donuts "Junk DNA" was a term coined by the media.

[alexrios]

The body is an amazing machine. Thank God for this machine.

[bobdalton]

An accurate worldview is important to doing science!

[RyanGazling]

An inconvenient truth. Thank you for your work.

[damieno]

Darwin evolutionary thinking IS 98% junk thinking! 😂 + or - 2% margin of error lol

[KeithStringer-oood]

And here's the real question if we evolved and we came out of the trees why didn't the rest there was a reason we're here as human good ladies and gentlemen

[brettmciver]

Yup look at the mindset during the c19 planned demic.

[iamjustsaying]

And though it was considered by Darwin himself to be the linchpin of the theory, turns out that there is no such thing as a vestigial appendage either.

[sliglusamelius]

Never in doubt, often wrong. That's modern science for ya.

[u.s.militia]

2%? Of course the other 98% is significant. It was probably too vast and random for it to take up their time. They latched onto a guaranteed 2% and said screw the other 98%.

[Vernon-Chitlen]

How could it be junk when a single strand in a pregnant mothers egg the size of this sentences period code for the formation in their sequences and order the 200 different types of the 37 trillion cells in an average adult human? The quadrillion cells of an adult blue whale?

[mathewhall]

I’m just grateful that God created the heavens and the Earth, and created all living things and not Darwin

[onename]

They suffer from a limited identity. When limiting yourself suffer you will.

[christophermartin]

Science discovers. Science corrects science. Religion, when forced, adapts to scientific discoveries. When the unknown is ‘cause god’, questions stop. When the unknown is ‘let’s find out’, thats when we shine.

[cleftturnip]

Darwinian thinking is why why know about dna in the first place

[bseely]

And some people think the earth is 6, 000 years old. Not sure I understand your point.

[joeyrivera]

The beauty of this is that science always end up saying: yes, the Bible talks about it and science confirms the Bible.

[Acts-]

God knows what he's doing.
Science, not so much.

[ajmittendorf]

What is the name of this scientist? I need to know if I am to quote him. Any and all information about him might be helpful for me to quote him.