Was there some kind of revenge for Manila order? - OOTF #shorts

preview_player
Показать описание


Follow WW2 Day by Day on Instagram: @ww2_day_by_day
Follow TimeGhost History on Instagram: @timeghosthistory

A TimeGhost chronological documentary produced by OnLion Entertainment GmbH.

#timeghost #timeghost #history #historical #history #worldwartwohistory #worldwartwo #ww2 #ww2history #historymatters #maps #cartography #camo
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

This question comes from Ralph Ranzinger, underneath our recent War Against Humanity episode "The Brutal End of the Battle of Manila". Thank you for the question.

WorldWarTwo
Автор

World War 2 was wild. In Europe we have Nazis saying “just following orders” in the Pacific we have officers saying “I didn’t give that order”

mgway
Автор

It is an old Roman Law principle: Silence implies consent, support, or approval. Therefore a commander is responsible for the conduct of his subordinates.

salavat
Автор

Yamashita was scapegoated. Apparently he was disliked by the higher command and after his astonishing victory at Singapore he was sidelined to Manchuoko for most of the war. His conviction and execution may have been justice but hundreds of ranking Japanese officers got away with their war crimes.

tpxchallenger
Автор

"I gave no such orders." "I was only following orders."

nelsonchereta
Автор

Frankly that is a very reasonable standard. You are a commanding officer. It is your job to command and control the actions of your troops. And if your troops go feral on your watch, you are responsible.

loganb
Автор

That Yamashita principle even applies if the offending soldier are from another service?
The main culprits of the Manila massacre was the Navy, that disregarded Yamashita's orders to leave Manila.

mogaman
Автор

It saddens me that people could effortlessly kill innocent civilians, such as what was going on in Asia, Ethiopia and Europe. May all of the victims Rest In Peace.

MT-tnei
Автор

Well, purposefully looking the other way is criminal negligence

alfonsogutierrez
Автор

Yamashita principle? I surely expect THAT to be uniformly applied across all conflicts of all nations. How about warfare ever since then?

gordonwhyte
Автор

They took no prisoners, neither did we, "island of death".

jessgatt
Автор

Interesting. I wonder if any US officer was ever held accountable under that...

pex
Автор

Look back to the two atrocities in Vietnam and Korea. Commanding officers were not held liable even though the "clean out" order came from them. Really bad policy to hold our enemies to a higher standard then ourselves.

jamesmckenzie
Автор

Not knowing the answer to the question, I'd assume he took notes and was quite inspired by those in Korea.

kaboon
Автор

Please proofread your captions. Thank you!

misterpatrick
Автор

Maccarthur had Yamashita killed because Yamashita embarrassed him during the Japanese invasion

Chief
Автор

Did they ever find Yamashita's gold?

wombatwilly
Автор

Why did he say "set a president known as ..." instead of "set a *precedent* known as ..."?

arthurneddysmith
Автор

Yamashita was literally not responsible

eruno_
Автор

Insane what happened, and never heard anything until you covered it

Ryuko-T