Symbol and Correpondance

preview_player
Показать описание
You're a poet, even if you don't know it.

This video is shared under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported
(Attribution, Non-Commercial, Share-Alike)

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

'The mundane is bizarre'. I couldn't agree more. Good stuff, thanks.

conferencereport
Автор

"truth"? For the most part, we can only come to grips with "reality" through the use of spatial metaphors and analogies . Excellent video...It made clear to me things I'd only grasped through a glass darkly...Please excuse the metaphor...

bsirius
Автор

@conferencereport
G'day Fred... Yay Team..! A Triangle is the ultimate structural unit (short of Perforated Monocoque). A Perfect Frame, the Geometry of which can't be deformed, except by catastrophic failure. Squares & Rectangles Are Imperfect Frames, easily deformable into Paralellograms ; adding double Diagonal Braces makes them into a Redundant Frame, as any member's removal still leaves the structure a Perfect Frame.... Due to multiple load-paths. Ciao !

WarblesOnALot
Автор

Near the end of the video, I could not erase the obvious metaphor of a torpedo from my thinking, and the words torpedo/anger were difficult for me to ignore....

bsirius
Автор

OK...I'm spamming...but when you talked of threes...I could not help thinking of Dante...He took three seriously, and it's interesting to me to think about why that was true for him.

Thanks for this...It was very intriguing...

bsirius
Автор

@RogerPodacterMurder
G'day, what quaint tastes you do have, a Paralellogram in Java ; why not drawn in Arabica, if Beans be the means ? You'll need to plight the Tension-Strength of Diagonal Bracing Wires, in marraige to the Reciprocal Compression-Strength of your Struts... Surely ? Otherwise the structure has no internal coherance. Triangles are fundamental, to making Paralellograms, Rectangles & Squares stay in shape...
Ciao !
G'day...

WarblesOnALot
Автор

I think Fred recognises irony, and therefore isn't easily offended when no offence is meant. He's British, you see. Ouch!

amidbillow
Автор

Among some of our male primate relatives aggression and dominance are expressed by behavior that mimics sexual mounting. So is the correspondence in metaphor between human male sexuality and sexual aggression due to sharing a metaphor, or the sharing of the metaphor due to their behavioral correspondence?

ThePeaceableKingdom
Автор

So in other words you just want to bust it.

karimdelakarim
Автор

Amazing how I always turn every arguement into an Evo-Creto debate.Debate.Snails..uh. What do l care-I must have spent less than 24 hours actually making love and it's too late now.What was it Betjamin said-"Any regrets, John?""Yes, not enough fucking."
Now, sometime I'm going to sneak Baudelaire in for no particular reason- could have done it here(Correpondances) or on snails.I think Fred doesn't mind the odd mind game or joke(all in the best possible taste).Wonder what Kenny knew about Saville?

amidbillow
Автор

You've been watching 'Body Heat' again, Fred.Pressure, steamy, hot, hm, not so sure, more screws, piledriver, bangs, for men, wet, sweaty, steamy for women.Anger is more volcanic, isn't it?
All gas and gaiters, eh;correspondences is more alchemical or hermetic, isn't it?It's how astrology arose.Most people think in pictures, don't they, or analogy, rather than rationally or logically.That's how Einstein thought(I think).Actually, we rationalise our intents-I think I'm going for the coffee, not to see the waitress.

amidbillow
Автор

I think the metaphor "pressure" is no more responsible for sexual aggression than the metaphor "explosion" is responsible for men blowing themselves up after they orgasm.

I believe asked you this before but don't recall an answer. In your analysis of the metaphorical basis of most language, are there any dead metaphors? Do any metaphors become (devolve into) denotative terms. I mean, I really have a hard time believing that when people use "understand, " they compute "as if standing under...."

DanaGarrett
Автор

If you can't see things in terms of other things-which we can cause empathy- I suggest that's autistic and men are definitely more autistic, and literal, than women. [Only got a 'Y', you see, no extra 'X'. Frustration!] Alan Ayckbourn's plays are often premised on such dichotomies!! Don't get much culture in Cornwall, do you, Fred?

amidbillow