Most usable A.I. Tool Every Producer Needs Right Now.

▶ FOLLOW ME

▶Contact - pls only for business related stuff!

▶▶▶ MY GEAR ◀◀◀◀◀◀◀◀◀◀◀◀

● Studio Software:

● Studio Hardware:

● DJ Equipment:

[ClavixusProducer]

I completely get it and I learned how to make it, but on the other hand replacing people with this stuff morally it doesn't feel good to me, I wish we could use AI to do Laundry, clean the house all that boring stuff, and keep doing music with real people.

[LitterBoxingAi]

When creating a cover song, it's essential to bring your own artistic interpretation to the work, whether through different instrumentation, a unique arrangement, or a distinct vocal style. This way, you can create a cover that pays homage to the original while still being recognized as a distinct and separate work.
To summarize, using AI-generated vocals in a cover song is just one aspect of creating a legally recognized derivative work. Ensuring that the music arrangement and overall production are also substantially different from the original is equally important. thoughts?

[wnllkmusic]

it was fairly obvious that stuff like this will come out at some point, but now that its here -

[JoshMobleyMusic]

is it legal to straight up take someone's performance like this and essentially style transfer to a new voice? I'm not so sure.

[chejoseofficialTV]

A few caveats. Legally release it as a cover is only one part. Some Distributors like Distrokid assist and help get the license from Harry fox as an example and allow the original writes to be paid through the MLC. Releasing for sale you will still need to get permission from the original writers for use of the mechanical license at a split cost with original writers. So just shoving a new vocal and saying legally releasing isn’t quite right. This only opens the door for the possibility to do it. ☺️

[Peter-guph]

This is a bad idea. I have worked professionally in film productions involving music copyright clearances and I can assure you it is definitely not legal to take a vocalist's performance as your source material and then just modify it through an AI voice transformer or plugin and then claim it's 100% original. All the phrasing, rhythm and inflections etc. of the original performance are still there and will easily be recognised by the original artist.

[davidrichmusic]

It's the way the music industry is going. There is fakeness everywhere from live stars singing to backing tracks, crap singers just pitch corrected and live recorded pop stars then having the performance mixed and enhanced before being put out as a live version. Over the years a lot has changed from vinyl records to Spotify. Most of the time it's the major players ripping off the Musicians who feel more under threat. I don't like this at all but if you view music as your business then you have to adapt and use whats out there good vid Jon, got a few moaners in the comments but thats normal for those who just moan and do nothing in life 😎

[dominicroy]

Wow John I had to give it a quick try pretty damn cool. I uploaded the song "This magic moment - Benny king" and chose Nicole and isolated everything and wow.... Just incredible. 6 minutes and the AI created her singing it solo. Ai is so sick.

[TimEdward-cr]

I’m afraid I have to respectfully disagree with you on this Jon. The A.I generated vocals had no life or air to them

[Pablo-pxct]

Problem is not to create music - its to be heard. No one cares about 1'000'000 covers from 1'000'000 -> we've entered the era of commodification. What counts is how you can access the market. Do you fit the current trend? Do you have a machine that pushes you.

[b.hornetiii.]

This is really great tool. 100% agree. You make a super song, and than it hits you, I need a great femal vocal in my case. Who should I call, hmmmm. Nahh, they're no good. Now you have all this on your disposal. Fantastic.

[richertz]

I tried it with my vocals, sounded like a bloke but a bit female. Long way to go!

[hanswillemmallon]

The next problem will be that record companies will create their own AI based tracks and use Spotify to fill the lists to play with and directly get the income from it without the use of any hired artist at all. 🙂. But I agree, the world has been upside down entirely in the music industry. But nevermind, its like ages, we all died when the sampler start to sample beats and vocals, we all had a heart attack when CDs got copied by thousands and we thought the world would end when spotify took all the royalties and paid pennies for streaming, we will see what happens, I think younger producers will make copies over copies and the usual way of creating of something entirely new will fade away soon.

[sonicpulp]

Cool generative program. Allows the artist to be more creative.

[maurice]

You are still using the original recorded track but altered with AI, are you sure its legal? i do know for a cover this is not allowed.

[MarcoS-pwpx]

That’s really amazing 😊 I will try this out with my own vocal ;) there are a lot of possibilities 👌

[gwsound]

Good to see you again Jon. Thanks for this one. I'm going to check it out.

[thelibrarian]

What reverb are you using there is it stock in logic or an plug in, cool video thanks😎

[virbrand]

So excited to make money and so very happy to reedit the work of an artist. Kongrats sir! Lolz

[rikkshow]

Buddy, you cannot steal someone's performance like that. You did derivative work based on the mechanical rights. You don't understand mechanical/recording vs publishing/writing rights. And you push this to the whole world, damn dude...