SpaceX Starship - Flaps vs. Wings!

preview_player
Показать описание
I explain why SpaceX chose to use wings instead of flaps on its Starship rocket!

#SpaceX #starship #elonmusk #starbase

Editing: John Young, Alex Potvin, Stefanie Schlang
Photography: Jordan Guidry, John Cargile, John Winkopp & Stefanie Schlang
3D Animation: Voop3D
Script & Research: Nathan, Soren, Oskar Wrobel, Felix Schlang
LIVE Production: Jonathan Heuer, Jordan Guidry
Host: Felix Schlang
Production: Stefanie & Felix Schlang
Graphics & Media Processing: Jonathan Heuer, Felix Schlang

Credit:

⭐SpaceX
⭐NASA
⭐VirtualSpace_3D on X: @Lolomatico3d
⭐The Ring Watchers on X: @RingWatchers
📄Links for this Episode:

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Also wings don't work very well on Mars or at all on the moon.

ekij
Автор

Also worth noting that Mars has no runways, likely another factor in favoring a vertical landing to a horizontal Plane-like landing.

SojournerArt
Автор

Its like a skydiver vs a pencil falling through the air lol

CrazyclayYT
Автор

At least they both have the same problem


goldgamercommenting
Автор

The space shuttle was a lifting body, the “wings” were for stability and control, , NOT flight .

davidaras
Автор

Compared to weight of extra fuel using to land the rocket, weight of wing is lower

Pachalam-en
Автор

There’s also no runways on Moon or Mars, this is the main reason, residual fuel is heavier for propulsive landing than gliding in! Felix is incorrect here, it’s about ability to land anywhere not weight.

nickymccoy
Автор

It's insane how quick Elon Musk and his friends is advancing technology

Tooomasbiwden
Автор

For hauling freight into space nothing beats starship.
For returning to earth with heavy cargo, nothing beats the shuttle. Plus it can land horizontally at an airport not in the ocean.

jbird
Автор

Besides, it looks more like Flash Gordon's ship.

cheagle
Автор

Why is Starship pointy: Because, The Dictator.

OneIdeaTooMany
Автор

Because Elon and Space X apparently uses the KISS philosophy. Use the simplest things that work. Less to go wrong. Yes, they have had failures, all things of this magnitude do, but look how fast they resolved them. Many large aircraft don't have ailerons anymore. They use spoilers or trim tabs for roll control. Large roll inputs are not really needed. Yaw and pitch control is more important.

SantaKrause
Автор

Wait until Elon installs a Rolls Royce fusion drive in the Starship V5

raymacdhomhnuill
Автор

We've 5-10 more years b4 fully reusable starships are productively operational. It's the nature of spacecraft development.

PiCorder
Автор

Fully resuerbal rocket?
But hostage ring 😂

kavindunilakshana
Автор

The shuttle...still better technology 50 years later !

agaragar
Автор

Imagine, if you will, how much of the DC-X would have if they used that kind of system...

johncampbell
Автор

No part is the best part, winglets won't burn!

infinitytothepowerofinfini
Автор

Can't understand why NASA did not think of this 🤔

coreydebruin
Автор

Shorter answer? SpaceX clever, Shuttle outdated.

StevenWalkey