The chart that explains the 2022 US election #shorts

[terryrussel]

MANY of the Founding Fathers warned U.S. NOT to allow party systems to form in our Halls of Governance.
"Specifically a two-party system will tear the country apart." George Washington

[ThePIMPaboveallpimps]

Only approval rating in the green was after 9/11 when the country was unified in its hatred for something else 😂

[intlvoiceofreason]

Conclusion: people don’t like it when you take their rights AWAY

[carnage]

Americans pretending they aren't just a two party system

[tomasvil]

I wish every short on youtube was this densely packed with information

[BlueNano]

Regardless the two party system is horrible and needs to go. It promotes divisiveness and allows for far less view points to be considered and effectively voted for.

[sethravillaofnisan]

"These guys took away our rights, maybe we shouldn’t vote for them."

I feel like we could've figured that out sooner.

[Frogggisimo]

As soon as the supreme court overturned roe V wade I knew that “Red Wave” would falter faster than a helium balloon in a needle factory

[ALtheGreat]

People are now voting for who they least hate...

[rylan]

The loop was so perfect. I thought you were gonna explain something else.

[stealthlord]

scotus really kicked the hornets nest with roe v wade

[dominicbrunsmeier]

You know what's the main flaw of democracy? If "I abstain" was a candidate, he would win at 2022 election.

[nitramnagrom]

The thing in common: people feel very strongly about those events

[davidallenmoneystories]

Opinions aside, I just have to compliment you on presenting these complicated statistics in a way that easy to understand. Cheers

[imthesnakeking]

"Sir, a second contraceptive has hit the Towers."

[twojacksandanace]

I understand that people feel strongly about RvW but overturning it didn't make abortions illegal.... it gave the states the choice to individually decide how they handled it, which means that the people living in the states get to coose how they want abortion handled. With the federal RvW no state had a choice, it's a big matter of gov. overreach. Does the federal government get to tell the states what they can and can't do on things they historically didn't have controll over, people don't seem to realize that if your state feels so strongly about abortion then there is no issue because your state can decide how it's handled. So any state putting restrictions on abortion obviously is majority againt it in some way. You see al these people in states that are restricting abortion screaming and everyone takes their side while noone thinks about the fact that they're actually the minority in their state... The overturning of RvW did NOTHING, any state that want's to keep it as it was under RvW can still do so, it's just that now the Feds can't force the people who didn't like it to just go with it. This is literally a win win for all sides involved, we all get what the populations of our states want.

[justinsmeer]

It’s almost like life altering events and decisions are very motivating 🤔

[Blowingmind]

That checks out, I went from "oh both parties don't really want things to change because it benefits them", to, "the precedent set by the overturning of Roe v. Wade has horrifying implications for our democracy, regardless of political leaning, and the GOP have shown they're not afraid to overturn rights that haven't been codified into amendments" or something like that

[theram]

Need to discuss weather fetuses have rights or not.

[derekdomer]

What you would expect to happen... Based on a chart. This was a huge simplification of an extremely complicated subject matter.