Freedom vs Security: Freedom at any cost?

preview_player
Показать описание
Is giving up some of your freedoms a fair price to pay to live in a secure society? Narrated by Harry Shearer. Scripted by Nigel Warburton.

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

aristoteles said: "Who prefers security instead of liberty, is a justified slave" 
(not sure if i translated it grammatically correct)

Userhardrockfan
Автор

If you're going to imagine an extreme world without laws, governance, or society, you must also imagine an extreme world where one man decides your fate. I'd personally take the freedom.

jonathanduncan
Автор

Beautiful illustration and message. Thanks for sharing

laessencia
Автор

Thomas Hobbes lived from 1588 to 1679, so he was 30 years old when the Thirty Years' War began in 1618 and 54 years old during the English Civil War (1642-1652).
Just to give historic context to his philosophy. Today, given the experience especially in the 20th century, we wouldn't arrive at the same conclusion (though this idea of security vs freedom is still very much present in our time, except that the leviathan takes the form of a dictator or otherwise autocratic ruler who offers relative economic prosperity in exchange for political inactivity).

alphamasterevi
Автор

Well the freedom vs security argument is that both is needed and only the middle ground is needed.

tammybezy
Автор

We don't have to choose between one and the other. But if tyrants try to force us to choose, assuming we'll choose safety under their boot, I'll choose freedom every time.

Kitkat-
Автор

*Insert something about Persona 5 Mementos Depths*

DoctorMonitor
Автор

Freedom and liberty arent the same thing

richardbanks
Автор

This is one of the easiest of false dichotomies to see through.
His first contention rest that people want security and then he proposes a way to provide it but then negates the fact that if we were in a free world there would be nothing stoping anyone from coming together on a said mutual basis for the same commodity (security) and could do so without by definition giving up security by allow an entire group of people to have all the guns while at the same time holding that all people are bad and want security at the same time .

derekmiller
Автор

like my parents say with everything there is a balance and I think this is no exception

Frogstand
Автор

Where can I get these posters appearing at the end?

vijaynyaya
Автор

And somewhere there is a good balance of security and freedom. 

midgetwars
Автор

I can't believe it can be this good

lorezemi
Автор

i wish there was a way to buy all the final images to put up in my room

MisterTwist
Автор

Is it me or does he sound like principal Skinner

dittoking
Автор

I think we should start looking at this less as an "either/or" thing and more as something along a spectrum.

Scarshadow
Автор

Security is important but freedom is most.

freedom
Автор

King eh? Well, I didn't vote you! How 'bout a social contract that merely commits to the non-aggression principle?

PMunkS
Автор

I’d rather freedom than safety. You can’t have safety without freedom.

marvinmartinsYT
Автор

The art of fighting without fighting - Bruce Lee

zatoichiable