13.8 Billion Light Years James Webb Space Telescope VS Hubble Images In 1 Minute #shorts #jameswebb

preview_player
Показать описание
13.8 Light Years James Webb Space Telescope VS Hubble Images In 1 Minute

The new heaviest space telescope in existence is the James Webb Space Telescope, or JWST.

We will rapidly observe the differences in photographs taken by the Hubble and James Webb space telescopes.

Hubble collected 342 photos over the course of 10 days with a total exposure time of 100 hours to create this Deep Field image. It exposed more than 3,000 galaxies dispersed across a small area of sky.

The 2012 Hubble eXtreme Deep Field picture is seen here. In this view, more than 5,500 galaxies may be seen, which took around 50 days during a ten-year period, totalling more than 23 days of exposure.
Time for JWST .
Its size bends space-time, giving us a cosmic magnifying glass and allowing us to see dim galaxies even farther away. These include some of the smallest infrared objects ever seen by science.

This 7,200 light-year-distance object, the Carina Nebula, is one of Hubble's favourite targets. With hills, valleys, and towers created of gas and dust scattered over the scene, it resembles an impressionist landscape.

With a far crisper image, JWST's upgraded image conveys the same sense of amazement. Here are stars that were once totally obscured by gas and dust.

STEPHAN'S QUINTET

This Hubble image from 2009 shows a magnificent collection of five galaxies.

That image of the cluster of galaxies was captured by the Near Infrared Camera and the Mid-Infrared Instrument, and it is one of the JWST's observations of the region.

Nebula of the southern ring.

This is the Hubble picture from 1998. The dimmer of the two brilliant spots in the image's centre, the "ring" is made up of the remnants of a dying star.
The star that started all of this turmoil was a little white dwarf, around the size of our Sun.

the JWST sensors' view of the Southern Ring Nebula, left The stars, which appear noticeably more spiky on the left, are one of the many changes between the two photos.
But both provide a breathtakingly fresh perspective on the universe that surrounds us.

Music from Uppbeat (free for Creators!):
License code: NP5Y1WVFRRH5C9JP

#jwstimages #jwst #jwstlive #jameswebbspacetelescope #jameswebbtelescope #jameswebbspace #jameswebbtracking #jameswebbtrack #science #astronomy #technology #space #physics #solarsystem #hubble #hubblespacetelescope #hubbletelescope
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

The size does not bend space time, only gravity does that. The size allows sight further out, ie further into the past.

laprepper
Автор

How do you repair it at a million miles? Bends space time? To the eye they don't look like that.

MT-xsfu
Автор

I hate to sound unappreciative. But, are we really going to see anything we haven’t already seen before? I know the JWST can see farther out and slightly crisper image; but it can’t look at exoplanets and we’ve already seen pics of nebulas and dwarf stars and what not.

Geojr
Автор

فتبارک اللہ احسن الخالقین اللہ اکبر اللہ اکبر اللہ اکبر اللہ اکبر اللہ اکبر اللہ اکبر اللہ

CrazyBoy-eorz
Автор

While JWST is doing a FANTASTIC JOB in sending better pictures of the universe, I wouldn't pull the the plug on Hubble just yet.
If NASA can get 40+ years from both Voyagers, I'm sure they can get as much out of Hubble (32 years and counting).✌✌✌✌

matthewpoplawski
Автор

“Its size bends space time”... the size of JWST has nothing to do with gravitational lensing caused by massive galaxy clusters. When explaining things in 60 seconds, be careful not to cut out crucial context like you did there

jonathanvesterlund
Автор

POUR LA NETTETÉ, RIEN À DIRE, SEULEMENT, ON NE VOIT QUE DES GALAXIES À PERTE DE VUES !, ET ÇA NE FINI PAS, DONC, ON ATTEND LE PROCHAIN TÉLESCOPE PLUS PUISSANT QUE LE JWST, PERSONNELEMENT, JE SUIS DÉÇU DES PERFORMANCES DU JWST !.

kaddourmhamed
Автор

That's are billion light-years so far away, but why even below 1 light year of our solar system each planets can't zoom in clearly what inside them. That make me quite disappointed to the James web. Yes I see the zoom in of Jupiter planet but it need to zoom in more closely to see what absolutely inside it. And all another solar system planets too. which even just less than 1 light year only so the picture and video should be better than billion light years. This is what's call the sequence of missions.

zarbitzmitsuwan