Solving the Problem: Summing a 1D Array to a 3D Numpy Array

Learn how to effectively sum a 1D Nuimpy array to a specific dimension of a 3D array, while ensuring optimal performance and accuracy in Python programming.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: sum in numpy arrays with different dimension

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Summing a 1D Array to a 3D Numpy Array in Python

When you're working with multidimensional data in Python, especially in data science or engineering, you may encounter scenarios where you need to sum arrays of different dimensions. One common case is combining a 1D numpy array with a 3D numpy array. In this post, we will explore how to effectively achieve this using two arrays with dimensions (10227, 127, 340) for the 3D array and (10227) for the 1D array. Let’s dive into the problem and the solution step by step.

Understanding the Problem

You have:

A 3D numpy array A with shape (10227, 127, 340).

A 1D numpy array B with shape (10227).

The goal is to add the elements of array B to the first column of every "slice" of the array A, without losing any of the original data in the other dimensions. In simpler terms, you want to modify the first column values of each 2D slice (127 x 340 grids) in A by adding corresponding values from B. The expected output array C should retain its original dimensions of (10227, 127, 340).

Solution Approach: Efficient Summation

Step-by-Step Solution

This method exploits numpy’s broadcasting and array manipulation abilities, making it much faster than iterating through loops. Here's the approach:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation:

Then, .reshape(A.shape) reshapes this repeated array to match the dimensions of A, allowing the addition to take place across the first dimension.

The result is stored in C, which contains the original data of A with B added to its first column.

Using a For Loop (Not Recommended)

While a straightforward implementation might be to use a for loop to iterate through each index, it is significantly slower. Here’s how that would look:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Explanation:

This method creates a copy of A in C, then iterates through each of the first dimension entries, adjusting each slice individually.

However, because of the looping and repeated adjustments, this method can be much more time-consuming and is not ideal for large datasets.

Conclusion

By following this guide, you will be well-equipped to handle similar tasks in your data processing workflows.