The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev quantum mechanics model, black holes, and random matrices - Douglas Stanford

The Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev quantum mechanics model, black holes, and random matrices
Douglas Stanford
Member, School of Natural Sciences
October 26, 2016

[kockarthur]

All these questions are great. They seem quite honest and relaxed. It really helps the viewer stay up to speed, which would otherwise be nearly impossible during a technical presentation on a relatively new concept.

[BennyBearesy]

This young man has the patience of a saint and the brain of Einstein - well done

[snao]

Thank you for uploading this video.
I'm currently reading his paper(arxiv1611.04650) and it is a very helpful explanation.

[eastwestcoastkid]

need to move the camera so that we can see the board. By the way, if there is a question it is not really a debate, it is how ideas are challenged in physics, especially theoretical physics.

[vaidphysics]

The problem with giving a talk to an audience of **very** smart and **very** distinguished people, is that it can be hard to tell them that "we can discuss it outside", when they ask a question which has absolutely no relation to the topic at hand.

[TheHassleFreeZone]

This is more like a debate than a lecture, which is okay except that it's often not possible to hear both sides of the debate. It might be a good idea to get speakers to repeat or summarise questions from the audience before answering them....

[tgeofrey]

I can to find those Big Bang Authors might have black holes on their thought process.. Duality is on Two eye site..Also vision

[stervi]

This video would be half as long if the audience didn’t keep rudely interrupting

[davidwilkie]

You cannot suppress the Quantum Fields Mechanism cause-effect if it's all there is.

The dilemma of "wave-particle", String Theory and so on that see the dominant identity of Quantum as microscopic, is that all the macroscopic features are built up from a micro state according to the BBT.
Calculus is a mathematical property that "fills the interval" from 1-0D state of an infinitely distributed vanishing point .dt to +/-infinity, and all phenomena are composed within this interval. Information, QM-TIME is quantized.

Time is change, in the range zero-infinity in one probability defined by eternal existence, so if all phenomena are compared, measured in relative rates of change between asymtotes, ("horizon" is used in some situations), of "solidity" and instantaneous difference approaching absolute zero. Then imagining a disconnect by suppression, it is possible-probable instantaneously but in continuity(?) (.dt is the "split hair" of the Quantum Mechanism) Observation.

Engineers and Mechanics in former days used machinery that "got the job done" even though it looked unreliable to an outsider. If the machine was operated by someone who knew what it was, did, and where the weaknesses were, then although it needed constant care, the operator-machine context was effective, at a price of tying down skills better used elsewhere.
If the 1-0D Quantum Fields Mechanism is the "machine" in contention, and the operators are highly skilled such that it's made to fit thought experiments not yet defined in context, maybe the outsider's view is helpful.

In this case it seems that the context is QM-TIME, and the elements of function are composed of closed cycles of relative proportions of that function, so if 1-0D is simultaneously pivotal and tangential phase-state dimensional proportions of quanta, then the Origin and Zero axies are the tangential asymptotic limits of the Quantum-Calculus "machine". Ie the Vanishing Point, .dt now.