How 2 violate the conservation of energy Noncommutative frequency nonlocality Neidan alchemy quantum

scroll way down on my blog for more math details and quotes.
Robert Flack, "This may allow you to amplify small signals - That's the game were in in the moment, in looking at very small signals...the quantum system seems to amplify itself!"

[markcooperartcomofficial]

I don't have a scientific background, haven't read the books you've read, but a lot of what you're saying lines up with stuff I've heard from alternative sources, spiritual books, and word of mouth teaching. I've experimented with doing the middle pillar ritual before meditation and I blacked out and had visions. I've also left my body several times. In meditation I can see intricate multicolored patterns and can see random people and places, but I don't know why I'm seeing what I see and what it is most of the time, other than the times where I purposely focused on specific things and had visions based on that. I spend most of my time working on art and am not as disciplined as I probably should be, but your videos are inspiring me to do more.

[voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang]

That's due to how Max Planck defined the constant. He chose the relationship, E=hf, where E is the energy, h is the constant, and f is the cyclic frequency.
If you consider the Euler identity, exp(2pi i)= 1, then look at some generalised exponential function, exp(i xy)=1, the product, xy, must equal 2pi. It just so happens that such exponentials are used to describe waves. An important point is that any product, xy, must be dimensionless, as the exponential itself must be dimensionless. Therefore the (x, y) pair are must be conjugate such that their product is dimensionless. Now, consider energy and time. The product is not dimensionless. However if you use the Planck formula, and divide E by h, we can consider the product, ft. We know that from the cyclic property of waves that the product should equal 2pi for a single cycle of the wave. Thus, ft=2pi when t corresponds to a single period. Unfortunately in that condition, ft=1. So we actually need the quantity, 2pi f, to satisfy the identity, which corresponds to the angular frequency, omega. Thus, we can write the Planck formula in terms of the angular frequency, E=hbar omega, rather than E=hf.
sometimes we talk about angular velocity, which is a vector. Therefore, the angular velocity formula is the same as the equation for angular frequency. Its SI unit is rad/sec.
Angular frequency (ω), also known as radial or circular frequency, measures angular displacement per unit time. Its units are therefore degrees (or radians) per second. Hence, 1 Hz ≈ 6.28 rad/sec. Angular velocity is represented by the Greek letter omega (ω, sometimes Ω). It is measured in angle per unit time; hence, the SI unit of angular velocity is radians per second.

[voidisyinyangvoidisyinyang]

Alain Connes - Temps et aléa du quantique Apr 14, 2015 "If you take very seriously that the origin of variability doesn't come from the passing of time but comes simply from the formalism of quantum mechanics, from the Hilbert Space. Then it's absolutely vital that you can relate to ordinary time and time evolution as we know. What I'm saying is...this solution depends on the fact that you have a subsystem, it depends on the factorization... [noncommutative]....

"You need to understand intuitively...this is the most difficult to explain...that this time evolution is UNavoidable....You can not suppress it... It's not an inner automorphism. It has the amazing property....it's in the center of the group of inner automorphisms. Any other automorphisms of the algebra will commute with it. It's canonical. It doesn't depend on any choice. ...

"You take a system that you repeat... it repeats everywhere ...to infinity...it's repetition that allows you to see time evolution...it's the factorizations which are infinite repetitions that give you this time evolution... Otherwise you wouldn't see it. ...Hilbert space and Hilbert Space operators KNOW and know a lot more than we think....the passing of time is due to our partial knowledge, because we don't know the full system....

"What are the observables for gravitation? Who can we say where we are? The answer is spectral [frequency]. ...It's not enough to know the spectral operators... ...Two noncommutative shapes that are Isospectral [i.e. both Perfect Fifth]...They have the same spectrum but they do not have the same second invariant. [Second-order tensors may be described in terms of shape and orientation.]

"You find three types of notes of the spectrum. Integers plus 1/4 [Perfect Fourth], Integers plus 1/2 [Perfect Fifth] and Integers in the square of the spectrum [Octave] there are three kinds of NOTES. When you look at the possible chords - this is like the piano in which you can play...because they are three kinds of notes. The chords of two notes are possible for some shapes [Perfect Fifth] but not other shapes [Perfect Fourth]. The point is spectral, given by correlations between the eigenvalues (frequencies) of the Dirac operator.

"There are factorizations with infinite degrees of freedom, that they generate, their own time; and this is a partial knowledge and of course it's related to thermodynamics and temperature and all that. ...The time evolution would not be the same if you changed T to Minus T. If it were the same when you changed T to Minus T then it would be trivial.

"What I want is to transmit a mathematical fact...it's extremely striking. It suggests a philosophical fact ...which is that the fundamental variability is quantum other than the passing of time.
"It's unique up to inner automorphisms; it means you have the flexibility to change it locally. So you can be locally out of equilibrium. You can have a pure density matrix which on the subalgebra in the factorization you see something which is not pure of course. Factor 4 x 4 matrices as 2 x 2 matrix times 2 x 2 matrix. Now take a vector, pure in four dimensional Hilbert Space... And then you do the inner transfer product of the four dimensional Hilbert space. ...That will be a factorization of Type III. ...A corresponding vector and you just repeat it. That's enough to get the time evolution....The time evolution is in the Subparts, it's not in the full thing.

"By the way, I should say, of course this was the motivation for why I spent many years studying noncommutative geometry...