Photons, Entanglement, and the Quantum Eraser

preview_player
Показать описание
Do quantum particles actually know if they're being watched like the double-slit experiment suggests? Does the delayed-choice quantum eraser finally prove this? No, but let's ask some better questions and see what's going on.
________________________________
VIDEO ANNOTATIONS/CARDS

How do we KNOW light is a wave?

What the HECK is a Photon?!

How Do Polarized Sunglasses Work?!

Three Quantum Myths:
________________________________
RELATED YOUTUBE VIDEOS

PBS Space Time on Quantum Eraser:

Vertasium on Single Photons:

Eugene Khutoryansky on Quantum Eraser:
________________________________
SUPPORT THE SCIENCE ASYLUM

Patreon:

Advanced Theoretical Physics (eBook):

Merchandise:
________________________________
HUGE THANK YOU TO THESE PATRONS

Asylum Counselors:
Matthew O'Connor

Asylum Orderlies:
Daniel Bahr, William Morton, I'mKorgThisIsMiek

Einsteinium Crazies:
Albert B. Cannon, Eoin O'Sullivan, Tim Ruffles, LT Marshall Faulds, Ilya Yashin, Rick Finn

Plutonium Crazies:
JKLMN Anderson, Al Davis, Kevin MacLean

Platinum Crazies:
Vittorio Monaco, Stephen Blinn, Mikayla Eckel Cifrese, Evgeny Ivanov
________________________________
OTHER SOURCES

________________________________
LINKS TO COMMENTS

Quantum Eraser:

Photoelectric Effect:
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

To clarify: I understand the "detection" at the screen is a different kind than one that might happen at the slits or any other detectors. It was just meant as a segue/transition to the main conclusion of the video: that quantum mechanics is just a model. The way quantum mechanics works doesn't necessarily say _anything_ about the nature of matter/light. If we input some initial conditions and a few interactions, it will give us a result that matches an experiment really well... but only after we do the experiment with a _bunch_ of particles over time. That doesn't mean we can make any judgements _at all_ about what individual particles are doing at any given moment.

ScienceAsylum
Автор

I love the “QM is not magic” mantra! Also particles being tiny waves makes a lot more sense than “they’re particle-wave magic hand-wavy particles!”. I’m so tired of being bamboozled by QM and double slits stealing my lunch money. The final part was a bit rushed for me though, I’d love to have the controversy around what’s going on addressed more meticulously maybe in another video.

danfg
Автор

The best explanation of the double slit experiment ever. I actually picked up quite a few new pieces of knowledge.

nybblesbytes
Автор

If someone says physics is ...
- boring
- for nerds
- difficult to understand
- badly explained
- needs advanced math knowledge
- or any other misconception ...
Just send them to the Science Asylum and they 'll see the 'light' in all its beauty and clarity !

ronnyvbk
Автор

many people who try to explain the double slit experiment always do so in a very vague manner, its like they don't fully understand it .... but your explanation was very elaborate nick, you did the best way ... better than all other explanations.

hugginskakono
Автор

Whenever one of my classmates asks “so energy wasn’t conserved?” I always think of you:

CONSERVATION OF ENERGY SHALL NOT BE VIOLATED!! ⚡️

tonylikesphysics
Автор

Clearest quantum eraser description i have encounter.

elgaro
Автор

This is a very useful and important video. The mystification of quantum mechanics is pedagogically horrific. We should always assume that everything can be understood, even if we don't fully understand it at this time.

YawnGod
Автор

Quantum mechanics might not be magic, but you have a magical gift for explaining things. You just demystified in mere minutes all the other videos and books I have read about the double slit excitement. I do believe Albert Einstein would clap for you.

royrosales
Автор

Nick, I am drunk and I still understood your video, that's how good of a teacher you are. Everything so clear and still succint. Great job!

danimateo
Автор

I understand now!


Feynman: "If you think you understand quantum mechanics, you don't understand quantum mechanics."


Oh...

MagnusSkiptonLLC
Автор

I am constantly amazed at how well you create highly educative yet very funny videos (I love all the twins appearances and recurring jokes like the energy conservation ^^!)! This one particularly helped me demystify a lot about my understanding of this experiment. Thanks so much for what you're doing :) !

PascalLaprade
Автор

I was having Science Asylum withdrawals, thank you for the fix 🙃

AL-SH
Автор

Nick just totally slam dunked the mysticism around the double slit experiment with extreme agression. This was VITAL, because as someone who have watched those vids, and been mystified, I needed this snap back to reality. Thanks!

SSMLivingPictures
Автор

This was a fantastic explanation. I've been trying to wrap my head around the particle/wave duality thing for ages, not to mention entanglement. This video makes things so much clearer now. Keep up the great work!

fishamajig
Автор

Crazy topic, expertly delivered, and the longest vid yet😁, great animations nick, 'Waves'from UK 🙋

gary_dslr
Автор

Great job Nick, after watching so many videos about this trying to figure out what kind of magic was happening here, it seems you are the only one that deserves the Nobel prize that has been put at stake! great explanation & a really conclusive model

ChuckTBA
Автор

Nick, when you say "all those videos were designed to mystify you", I knew you gonna kill it. All those videos are twisting our minds to make us and your videos makes us understand. You are literally the best science youtuber for education, the other ones are more in the show business. Exceptional.

allannirvana
Автор

Nick, this is by far the best explanation of the double slit experiment on the internet. I have watched most of them without helping me understand the deeper details. Thanks!

PeterMatisko
Автор

Thank you, Nick Lucid, for your patience in replying to a question I had in another recent video. I had lost sight of the fact that you were dealing with motion/relativity; I hadn't yet put aside my (ancient) education in classical physics, and you very kindly set me straight. That really matters when someone's doing a scary thing - physics on their own!

regular-joe
visit shbcf.ru