APEC 6/12: BAE, Project Greenglow, and Beyond! + UAP Panel Discussion

12:00pm PT – Rob Chambers – Greenglow and Beyond

Rob Chambers will recount his involvement in British Aerospace’s Project Greenglow, as well as describing some experiments to find connections between gravity and electromagnetism. He will also present some speculations on a possible relationship between gravitomagnetism and diamagnetism, a characteristic of materials such as superconductors and bismuth, both of which appear frequently in antigravity lore. Rob will additionally describe experiments that were funded but for various reasons never satisfactorily concluded during Greenglow’s existence, in the hope that others will pick up where it left off. He will conclude by describing some neglected inventions and experiments that might be suitable candidates for replication efforts. Rob is an aerospace systems engineer with over 25 years’ experience of inertial, satellite and terrain navigation systems.

2:00pm PT – Franc Milburn, Nick Pope & Michael Schratt – UAP Panel Discussion

The official Pentagon report on UAP phenomenon is scheduled for release this month, and details of what it contains have already been leaked to the press. As government officials and former Presidents continue come forward on the issue, UAPs have become a topic of global importance – prompting even foreign competitors like China to acknowledge their ongoing investigations into the issue. In this special UAP panel discussion, we’re joined by Franc Milburn, Nick Pope, & Michael Schratt to explore the contents of the report, the evolving story of UAPs in the media and society, and the ramifications of what this means for humanity.

4:00pm PT – Mark Sokol – Falcon Space Lab Updates

Mark Sokol and associates will present updates on their experimental research in the lab, and we will be featuring an update by Wayne Ojala on his latest experiments.

5:00pm PT – Open Discussion & Ad Hoc Presentations

Conference guests interested in presenting experimental info to the group are invited to participate at this time, and our presenters will be available to take questions & discuss experiments.

Links & Resources:
• Rob Chambers: LinkedIn Profile | BBC Greenglow Story
• Nick Pope: Former UK Ministry of Defence UFO Specialist
• Franc Milburn: The Pentagon’s UAP Task Force | Scientific Coalition for UAP Studies
• Michael Schratt: The U.S. Air Force Versus The UFOs (Amazon)
• Falcon Space Facebook | YouTube
• Jeremy Rys: Alien Scientist Website

[samthomson]

Remarkable stuff, thank you for the public service of sharing all this information with the YouTube community. It’s a joy learning from these brilliant presentations, and especially hearing the conversations where the engineers, scientists, and investigative enthusiasts are able to offer their professional feedback on specific line items from presentations, or from the broad body of research out there. For me, the back and forth dialogue where you all can civilly comment on the ideas being presented and build from each other’s mistakes, is the best part about these. Looking forward to following this serious discussion as the topic evolves. Keep up the admirable work, and I hope you can get Lou Elizondo on for a level headed, serious, academic, and friendly discussion. The interview you all could do (or just you if you do it for your channel independent of APEC) with Lou would be the most inquisitive interview yet with the guy. As a side note, some of the presentations are so thorough that they take time to digest. That certainly a good thing, but it’s a shame learning about an idea after the fact of the APEC conference, and then not being able to ask pointed questions aimed at a specific presenter. Accordingly, it would be nice if the APEC community could continue the conversation using some sort of online forum. For example, the first presenter was brilliant, but as it was my first time learning about so much of that, I feel I need to correctly conceptualize before I can even begin to ask him something insightful. If the presenters were present on a well organized online forum, it would be an excellent place to keep the insightful conversation going without losing momentum or enthusiasm for the conversation revolving around particular matters given throughout these various APEC conferences. This would allow the community to engage in the content, learn from it so we can keep the conversation from being derailed by asking excellent questions facilitated by the community doing its homework, so to speak, serve as an aide as to get higher and higher level scientists involved in the discussion long after an APEC event ends, and for folks like me for certainly won’t be splitting the atom, but want to know where to throw in our support. The meeting of the minds here is what this subject needs to come to fruition, and having a venue wherein you can take this seriously by reading and sharing papers, and hearing from those smarter then yourself, would provide a venue of knowledge exchange unlike any other, and one the alternative propulsion community would really enjoy being able to do. For the time being, what you all are doing now is incredible and better than the best. I’m just spit balling ideas because I think this whole APEC thing is bad ass. I don’t see anyone else discussing this stuff as well as you all do, taking it as seriously, and being enthusiastic about researching dense but exciting cutting edge concepts. This forum is intellectually honest, with no hidden agendas or disingenuous money schemes, and it’s exactly what the multifaceted problem posed by UAP/USP/Trans-Medium-Craft need to be adequately addressed, and for those interested in taking this conversation seriously to gravitate towards as to be caught up with the best and brightest ideas aimed at at splitting this atom of understating, and to know who needs the support from non-foot soldiers like me in order to make these ideas a reality. It’s a hard subject, but through the checks and balances system this open dialogue provides, may actually be figured out. I believe in you all - you can do it. I’d love to see this APEC seed germinate into a well designed mechanism aimed at pressing up this hill of science. It’s already great, but the potential build more momentum is there. You all are tapping into a very enthusiastic audience that only want the best for you all, and the more momentum you can build, the more of that audience will gravitate their support to you all, the faster you will accomplish these life changing goals. It’s not about if, it’s about when. When will now be then? Well, with you all putting your nose to the grindstone and gaining support momentum through an enthusiastic community - I’d wager soon. Looking forward to what comes next!

[LisaLee__]

I'm 1:50 in (1 hour and 50 minutes) I have to go, it's difficult to not fall asleep. Could be me of course. Please continue the great work.
God bless.
Love the 1st caller

[ElChicoTorro]

Can someone explain in layman's terms what's going on in the experiment? Super cooled super conductor / quantum locking ?

[sleevegarnish]

very interesting conversations and thank you for doing this J ...
! ~;)

[deathproofbum]

The Chinese military has only really become what it has over the last couple of decades, and most of its technology is stolen from Russia or the US to dare say many other parts of the world.

It's shipping fleet is barely functional compared to the tried and tested European and US fleets, and it's soldiers have never seen actual combat. Rather than its air fleet being fifth generation, it's nearer three and a half gen, i'm not saying that they will be some pushover, however, either are they some experienced battle hardened cutting edge force to be reckoned with.

Russia went broke at the end of the eighties partly due to funding other communist countries attempting to show to the world that it's ideology is superior, when it could barely pay for its own needs, also spending a fortune trying to catch up and producing thousands of nuclear warheads. Then Russia got paranoid when it was bluffed into believing that Ronald Reagan was starting a 'Star wars' programme, that then was the end of the USSR as it wasted a fortune on its own project, as the US had no intention of starting it's own star wars project. On occasion, and only because cool heads prevailed, Russia nearly launched its nuclear arsenal at a flock of geese to what is recorded as a 'UFO' incident seen on radar.

Russia was broke, and even if they did happen upon their own 'Roswell' they didn't have anywhere near the funding to back engineer it, even if it could be done. China can't even produce the latest generation micro chips, and i would put Russia above China as being able to produce a anti gravity craft, and the chances that they have one is about zero to nil. If the US have indeed recovered crashed extraterrestrial crafts (which i believe they have) and with it being the only country on earth having the resources to back engineer it and build their own, there is about the same odds that i gave Russia and China that, that Tic Tak which was filmed by the US jets as it was playing about with the military was US made. That craft is thousands if not tens of thousands of years (not generations) more advanced than anything the best brains on our planet could produce, the US has most likely built a very bad inferior copy, however, nothing near the capabilities shown by that craft. Who or whatever is controlling that vehicle is on another plain of new physics, with its main body made from materials from another solar system and layered seamlessly in zero gravity without a rivet or nut and bolt insight, by temperatures hotter than the centre of our sun.

How anyone can witness the radar film saying they have a 'open mind' only to think it's Russia, China or the US, after at long last say since Roswell we have some of the best definitive proof of a alien driven craft that the UFO community has been praying for decades to get their hands on, and it has gone mainstream, only to think it's one of ours, do not deserve the occasion. We do not have the capability, mathematics, materials, power source, full stop, to build anything near that craft which was presented to the world.

[rikimitchell]

I ve a question for all viewers of this conference if you have the technology required to travel between star systems when arriving at an as yet unsureyed system what would you focus your energy on mapping the topological features of the ocean or seeking out intelligent life??

[md_free]

Sixth comment, thank you guys and gals for contributing to the conversation in this subject. What credence do you give the Nazi occult theory and Antarctic bases? Von Braun wrote a book about going to Mars that said a man named Elon would lead the Human Race to Mars.... Weirdness...

[md_free]

A break away civilization, but living inside the Earth with gateways in the ocean and the continents.

[colelider]

Another video of barely hearing anything from certain people. Most of the other people had proper volume. You won't hurt someone's feelings if you tell them to move their microphone closer. It ruins their whole presentation when we can't hear them...

[rikimitchell]

I'm quite surprised that there is such a consensus surrounding the role of government agencies being the originators of advanced tech this is totally at odds with the normal reactive posture of governments world wide ...IE they do not create they procure the created

[alexjones]

Great show I like the content in my belief I dont think alien disclosure will occur this month I made a video about it

[sjakiem]

who do you expect to watch 6 hours of panel discussions? I adored the fact full summaries you posted a decade ago, but i don't have time for these long sessions. Unfortunate, because i assume interesting things are being said.

[samhussain]

It's not a theory, everyone will find out eventually

[jackgoodell]

I know how to build a free energy device all jokes aside it's incredibly no more complicated than a normal electric motor or generator just a little bit not much my. The hard part is I have no idea of how to get the ideal out build the machine but unless I know how to build the machine

[rikimitchell]

Why do ufo guys sound like they are looking for God?

[PleiadianDreams]

~ Greetings and respect most esteemed Alien Scientist, the Aliens want you to see my Playlists. ~

[solidspirit]

Brother...Bob Lazar truly debunked on the behaviour panel (youtube)

[Cybergrip]

This is very long and with all the stuttering, stammering and speech crutches of the participants makes it very challenging to listen to and understand.