Were Nurses Defamed during an Election? | Part 1

preview_player
Показать описание
Gerard and Ericka claim their fellow nurses' union members defamed them during an election!

The Original! There’s only ONE Judge Judy. Visit our website for where to watch, weekdays.

#JudgeJudy
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

If JJ doesn’t have time to hear the plaintiff’s evidence, then she should have skipped this case. He was trying to explain the procedure and how things work but she didn’t even give him a chance.

SkyDiverTO
Автор

I like Judy, but she is full of bull on this case. The evidence is more than likely that someone on that committee was guilty.

Wjohnson
Автор

JJ is WRONG about dismissing the idea that only the members have access to the addresses. the plaintiff is crystal clear about that: infuriating

lindag
Автор

I think the plaintiffs are telling the truth. Just no proof

MazvitaMasanzu
Автор

If I wanted actual justice I would NEVER go on Judge Judy.

stuff
Автор

They sent that slanderous shhh to the other members. I wholeheartedly believe the plaintiffs!

MelsRedPhone
Автор

I usually don't skip Judge Judy cases, but I'm not finishing this one. The defendants are laughing like they're guilty as sin, and JJ is getting under my skin.

jeffrowisdabest
Автор

It’ll take 6 months in another court… It will take 6 minutes with Judge Judy

nilaja-itsmylife
Автор

To everyone who’s complaining about JJ: the reason she says that the evidence can’t be proven is because the plaintiff do not have forensic evidence. They only have the step-by-step process, which should be taken. But that does not preclude anyone, hacking, stealing, lying, to get information.

Juicetheeunuch
Автор

I think sometimes JJ already knows who is going to lose and gets impatient. She was particularly grumpy this day. 😅

BeKindAllKinds
Автор

They seem to be basing their case on "nobody had access to those names and addresses", then they conceded that the parent union had them. That's a big problem with the case. I'm unconvinced the names and addresses are secure. I mean, they need to send out correspondence and things like election dates to the members. That list could have been accessed by anybody, and all kinds of defamatory statements sent out, from how the candidates go to Thailand for access to children for sex, to spending union funds to organize a dog fighting operation. That doesn't mean the opposing candidates created the documents or sent them.

jeffreyclinard
Автор

“Just do it fast”— 😂😂💀 JJ was ready for lunch 👩🏻‍⚖️

prettyricky
Автор

I actually gave up 2 minutes into this case. I don't usually give up on them like that.

bdso
Автор

Judge Judy pisses me off when she refuses to listen to people. "You can't prove that to me." SHUT UP and listen, and maybe they can.

crc
Автор

I saw four parts!! Great start to a 3 day weekend 🎉

victorromos
Автор

All government offices have to make any/all information accessible to the public, even salaries.

Jenny_
Автор

Plaintiff: I will do it.
Judge Judy: Then, do it fast! 😂

-az-
Автор

There are too many people on both the plaintiff and defendant side for JJ to have patience in this case. By the time she banged her desk at 2:58 and told the plaintiff to pay attention she was already done.

I also love how she smiled at the plaintiff as he was trying to explain. 🤣

ajfoodiesaiyan
Автор

"Sue has the addresses and gave them to him"
Then why did you not bring sue as a witness?

thenerdytiger
Автор

JJ "Prove IT" Guy gives exact reason . . . JJ "But that's not proving it" . . . Me: JJ you just need a snickers sis cause he made valid points and the other side was visually shaken by his knowledge of the rules

SAVINMEEKZ
welcome to shbcf.ru