Inmate spars with defense attorney

preview_player
Показать описание
Defense attorney Jonathan Schildgen cross-examines inmate Daren Eckford during a hearing for Quinn James at the Kent County Courthouse on Friday, June 8, 2018. James, who is a former Kentwood Schools worker, is facing trial for raping a 16-year-old Kentwood girl, Mujey Dumbuya, who was found dead in Kalamazoo.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Don't ask infantile questions man, loved seeing even the judge smile at that one

QYXP
Автор

24 years in prison? He doesn't give a damn. He got nothing to lose.

archimedesblackhearr
Автор

"You don't get to decide."
"I just did, man. I just did(laughing)."
An inmate Matlock.

leemarie
Автор

Samuel L Jackson, he's in everthing.

oneangrygoy
Автор

That’s how you talk/answer when you have absolutely nothing to lose.

michaelm.
Автор

NEITHER IS THIS A SPAR OR IS THAT A DEFENSE ATTORNEY

ohhi
Автор

when i read the title i thought by spar they meant punching eachother, i was wrong

naimhussain
Автор

When he said "I just did" I laughed at that. He was right, he did decide, hahaha!

NockyBoober
Автор

Dont ask no infantile questions... Think about the choices you're making. LMAO

nicolemarie
Автор

This is an example of how NOT to cross-examine a hostile witness.

MatthewHarrisLawPLLC
Автор

Your capacity as a lawyer is a laughing matter. HA

tomwilhelm
Автор

Just stamp your little form sonny, and stop wasting my time.

psalmtone
Автор

Thought he was defending himself until I heard the word
“objection” 🙄

alenalee
Автор

At 00:32 the judge smiles at his response, even she knows it was a stupid question. Love it!😂

exeaux
Автор

If anybody missed this lawyers last statement, he basically put a hit on this mans head. He literally asked if his testimony granted him lesser of a sentence. He called him out as a "snitch" which in american prison is a death sentence.

CreativeCAP
Автор

How any juror believes a jailhouse snitch is beyond me.

christophermchale
Автор

I don’t see any wrongdoing on the witnesses part. It’s an adversarial relationship. It’s okay for a witness to not cooperate with a questioning attorney. The goal is to make the attorney work hard in gathering testimony, and to disrupt his strategy. Cooperation in ones annihilation is not mandatory.

wilrobles
Автор

0:32 i had the same smile on my face as the judge when i heard that question.

PaperCutUGaming
Автор

"I just did man, I just did" 😂

Niko-xzlk
Автор

If I ever get called to testify, when the bailiff asks me if I swear to tell truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, I'm going to say no. That way I can't get charged with perjury.

plertisdibble