Particles are not in Two Places at Once | Quantum Physics for Novices Part 1 : Vectors

Often quantum physics is described through the notion of things being in several places at once. This video offers a correction to that notion by introducing vectors.

Animated using Manim.

[fundachem]

60 subscribers in a day from scratch ain't a small thing..
It was vert interesting. Keep up the content❤️❤️❤️

[JohnDeanMusic]

One minute in and my brains asking "Is reality made up of infinite vectors?"

[muhammadnoumankhan]

Sir i have been watching videos about quantum mechanics for a long time but this is the first time that i felt some of this stuff. You are very good teacher Sir. Plz continue making videos on quantum mechanics plz

[raiden]

Hey, it was a great explanation indeed, please keep on doing.. 😀😀

[Pengochan]

Linear algebra is the "language" large parts of the theory of quantum physics are written in. To effectively communicate about quantum physics, understand and discuss it, one should have at least a basis understanding of linear algebra (although Feynman in his QED lecture managed to find a simpler abstraction for some parts of QM).

It's really nice to see someone building this from the ground up, with the LA alongside.

Usually when studying physics at some university LA is mandatory (as it should be, since it's such a powerful tool in modern physics).

[TheyCallMeHacked]

Very good explanation. I hope your channel grows :D (also, very good use of 3b1b's Manim)

[jakecoffee]

A much more Elegant description, sir. Unfortunately vectors are not included generally in that introduction period to Quantum Mechanics. This would however be an ideal time for it.
Your video was great! I'm on to the next..

[sshreeharsha]

More videos pls.
Also pls explain the last part in detail loved ur video very much.
Enthusiastic abt quantum physics but find it difficult but ur video helps me understand it in a different way 🙏

[LukoIsHereomg]

Great video! Nice touch with the vectors, back in my bachelor physics days I started with them too

[lawrenceworrell]

This still does not explain interference. At least I don't understand how this describes interference. or where the interference comes from, if not the particle itself.

[oneletterz]

Thanks for the video. It was interesting. There was a good amount of 'blank screen's during the explanation and I wondered if my screen shut off a couple of times. I know animations can be time consuming, but even a word or something (maybe your channel logo in a corner?) would let me know the screen is still on and I wouldn't need to try and tap the screen to wake it up. I liked your explanation otherwise though. Again, thank you.

Edit to change 'would' to 'wouldn't'.

[UltimateEntity]

Great video, can you turn on the auto subtitle next time? (You can change it in Youtube Studio)

[gabrieltaylor]

You mean the particles aren't really in 2 places at the same time???? Shoot! Well, so much for what I was thinking about!

[mr.bashbashierkoukeh]

Great work. ButI think the probability of your wave function examples demonstrated in 6:50 is not equal to 1(not normalized) . Shouldn't be?

[shalomlhi]

exactly what I was looking for, however bit confused with the last part after 6:40