Are Banks Really Safe?: New Updates On Silicon Valley Bank Collapse | Forbes

preview_player
Показать описание
Senior editor at Forbes, Alex Konrad, speaks with Rosemarie Miller on "Forbes Newsroom" about the Silicon Valley Bank Collapse.

Fuel your success with Forbes. Gain unlimited access to premium journalism, including breaking news, groundbreaking in-depth reported stories, daily digests and more. Plus, members get a front-row seat at members-only events with leading thinkers and doers, access to premium video that can help you get ahead, an ad-light experience, early access to select products including NFT drops and more:

Stay Connected
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Why hire a risk manager to hedge interest rate risk when we now know the Fed will step in to guarantee all depositors? Privatize profits and socialized losses is now the Feds motto.

tuomasholo
Автор

Just once, I'd like to see our business press warn of a disaster BEFORE the disaster

bluecoffee
Автор

Biden & Yellen both say they are.

So the smart money is on "Hell No!"

joe.oneill
Автор

Buzzfeed supposedly heavily invested in the woke SVB. Whoops. See ya.

ElevenDollarCheese
Автор

Thank you Forbes for sharing this news.
CJM I .
03/14/2023. 12:50pm EST USA NJ 07026.

christophermiller
Автор

Is anybody talked and how they wrote checks into bonuses to all their employees before they went under so you take the money from the people and give it to your employees knowing that your bank's going to fail

briansmith
Автор

Why am I not surprised that, in the midst of their bank FAILING, the people at the top (who are MOST to be held responsible for its STILL MADE SURE THEY GOT THEIR BONUSES?!

If the bank you run IS tell me HOW you're still qualifying for these massive bonuses????

And, when you know the main issue is not being able to make PAYROLL....WHAT KIND OF MONSTER STILL ACCEPTS A FRIGGIN BONUS, ANYWAY?!?!

As if, "well, these were 'pre-scheduled' bonuses" somehow justifies the

audrajeanrussell
Автор

I would like the names of everyone whose deposits over the $250, 000 threshold are covered by the FDIC in disregard of the rules be made public and the amount they received be made a matter of record.
I'm personally curious which politicians, if any, are being bailed out by the government relaxing or outright ignoring the rules.

claudermiller
Автор

Some one with "common sense" please answer this... Why continue to deposit money after the $250, 000 FDIC insured is at max!?!??? Smh TRUST NO ONE NO MAN NO BANK WHEN IT COMES TO YOUR HARD EARNED MONEY! SMH ...Have multiple accounts at multiple banks... NEVER HAVE YOUR EGGS IN ONE BASKET!

lashawannajoyner
Автор

No worries your money is just as secure as the boarders, no worries 👍

tommybryant
Автор

I wonder how many homeless could have used a bail out to avoid the streets?
Ah **** 'em, they weren't bankers.

roberts
Автор

Just buy bitcoin already. Screw these banks

chronicxswagger
Автор

Bankers who take enormous risk and gamble with deposits of customers need to be indicted and thrown in jail. There is no excuse for this behavior. They figure they cannot make any money when interest rates are low so they set up buying bonds that end up failing when interest rates go up. The Republicans were the ones who deregulated banks thereby setting up banks that invest in risky stock and bitcoin and other businesses. Lock them up. Bankers who gave themselves bonuses on depositors money need to be forced to pay it back!

skylark
Автор

Crypto exchanges like FTX or Kracken is not decentralized so decentralized blockchain crypto must be the answer. Use wallets so crypto remains decentralized

starseedenergy