2024 Mazda CX-50 vs 2025 Subaru Forester | Comparison & Review

In this video we compare the 2024 Mazda CX-50 and 2025 Subaru Forester. Are you trying to figure out the differences between the two models? We take a look at some exterior features, then hop inside to see how each model compares to one another. Which is the best vehicle for you? Check out this video to find out!

00:00 - 00:14 - Intro
00:15 - 02:16 - Forester Exterior
02:17 - 04:25 - CX-50 Exterior
04:26 - 08:29 - Forester Interior
8:30 - 11:35 - CX-50 Interior
11:36 - 12:28 - Pricing, Comparison & Outro

[danielroberto-wj]

Very thoughtful and through review of these two Japanes competitors. Will you be doing another comparison of the top of line Mazda CX50 and Subaru Forester Touring also? Few buyers go for base models. But in these two suv's one get quite bit of good equipment from both manufacturers. One problem one encounters is the for cuts for commercials, which is a new Youtube annoying feature.

[tuan]

I prefer the Forester more than the CX50's.
But if I buy the Forester, I will get the Touring trim (Not Limited). It has 360degrees camera.

[chrispnw]

I think it should be compulsory to speak to the difference of the Subaru AWD versus FWD-based AWD offerings. When people see/think AWD most envision four wheels turning all the time providing grip NOT FWD and AWD when slip is detected. It is a distinction with a big difference. This also explains why Subaru MPG is slightly less.in comparison.

When driving in Lake Tahoe under bad conditions, the Subaru performs much better than the rest in snowy and icy conditions.

[Cali_]

Mazda cx50 looks more expensive materials are more upscale.

[jerpsrn]

I've test drove both. Honestly, if you want comfort and city driving, CX50 is not for you.

[mossmiller]

It is almost as if Subaru was influenced style wise by the 2023 CX-50. Both have a more angular look than with previous models. The Subaru Limited deserves the 2.4 liter turbo as an option, while the CX-50 suffers from a less expensive rear suspension than the CX-5, so the Subaru would be better on rough forest roads. Both have dated, confusing infotainment. In normal commuting, both are fine with non-turbo engines, and can be had for under 35k in more basic trims. The CX-50s now have rebates as sales of the 2024 models have been slow. Meanwhile, the Forester has had a significant price increase for '25, but dealers in my area (Austin, TX) are already offering discounts.

[JuanDavidMaya]

Sad that Subaru's don't have front parking sensors

[chrislim]

Who cross shops a cx50 and a Forester. They have nothing in common re target market