Consequences of Decentralization — Daniel Treisman

preview_player
Показать описание
Political Scientist Daniel Treisman on political decentralization, tax breaks for businesses, and Russia’s budget problems in 1990s
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

State Government can also be weakened by further decentralization.

wajahatsaeed
Автор

Fiscal decentralization has strong evidence showing its benfits in reducing both corruption levels and the negative effects of corruption on the economy.

HobbitnCN
Автор

When you see no option other than governments or corporations to run society.

moisesmartinez
Автор

Decentralization is the main reason for 1. Criminality and 2. Privatization

pierren___
Автор

We have to run a test server in a local town with population of 50, 000. To see how it affects the society.

flyaway
Автор

now I believe in decentralization even more than before🤣

javadtaghavian
Автор

An argument against decentralization from a Californian, we all know how well his ideas are turning out for his state 🤣 this is the best video to promote decentralization!

rekindlefitness
Автор

Decentralized goverment is much better for the people but not for this guy and the rueling class.

emil.jansson
Автор

In summary this guy thinks decentralization is bad in some cases because it will take power of corrupted central authorities (aka modern monarchs).
Bitcoin is hope!

rodrigopintof
visit shbcf.ru