Panasonic GX85 GX80 vs Sony a6300 a6400 a6500

The GX85 is still going strong. Why? What makes it so special? Why do some prefer it over the Sony 6000 series that have a bigger sensor? It's not picture quality. Not camera size. Not weight. What then? Find out as two classics are compared side by side. Enjoy!
Subscribe and tell your friends about MarkusPix. Cameras used in this video- wide shot- JVC LS300, close ups:Sony FS5ii Fujinon 50-135 Mic: Sennheiser 614w fethead phantom
Subscribe and tell your friends about MarkusPix

[NickLVIN]

I love this channel. The whole world is talking about the Canon R5 and a7S III and Markus Pix is reviewing the GX’s and the a6000 series. Love it!!!!

[jgorton]

Can't believe you would do a camera review comparing a body with stabilization and one without, and then admit you didn't even try the stabilized camera, and then say it was simply too heavy. Why not just save us the time in the first place and say you hate this camera because it's too heavy. I'm old school. I like heavy stuff.

[mrmatt]

Came here for the cameras. Stayed for the hair.

[billb]

I personally also find tremendous value in the GX85 versus the Sony for stills photography. Lens availability for APS-C on Sony is not nearly as vast as for M43, especially if you don't count the full frame lenses that would make the Sony's heft significantly more than the GX85. I'm a FF shooter (Nikon) who just bought the GX85 after this struggle between Sony and the Lumix. I have an a6000 but lens choices are there, but not in some of the small form factors available in M43. For example, I wanted the smallest package to have with me all the time. The kit lens is about the same size as the Sony kit, but the 14 and 20mm M43 pancakes are just tiny and have apertures of 1.7. I know there are Sigmas with apertures as large as 1.4, but the 16mm lens is quite hefty compared to a 14mm or 20mm 1.7 Panasonic lens. If lens size didn't matter, I too would probably choose Sony, but not without image stabilization built in, which also drives price upward significantly.

For me, the GX85 was best value, best feature and best size combined in one options. I will buy larger lenses, but when size is the ultimate goal, nothing really beats it with 14mm 1.7, 20mm 1.7, 25mm 1.7, 42.5mm 1.7 or 45mm 1.8 Olympus. Those lenses are just so tiny that carrying it is a pleasure and tucking it away and not being "that photographer over there" is awesome. I don't need the world to see me out and about looking like a pro carrying my heaviest Nikon gear. I just need to get the shots, come home and then enjoy without being a distraction, and the GX85 does that for me.

[trainer]

I bought the GX85 a year and a half ago when I took up photography. I chose it because of the image stabilization and its performance reviews. I like that it has a bit of weight to it. Makes it seem substantial and feels good and n my grip. He should have used it before making a discussion. Sometimes the thing you like least becomes the thing you like best when you spend time with something.

[KenKnorr]

4:31 " geek out at stuff like this." - Love your passion for this stuff... I can always count on getting great feedback about all things cameras! Thanks for taking the time.

[duncanmcleod]

Am I the only one that believes that Markus is one of the most genuine people on this platform? He just gives off a vibe of just a genuine person, i hope you are doing well Markus. Stay safe :)

[jdawg]

Markus. I love the reviews but you have a lot of talent. I would really like more how to's and tutorials from you! I think you have a wealth of knowledge to share with us newbs. 😁. Keep up the good work.

[thecasualhoarder]

I have a GX85 and your spot on, it's great for video and never overheats, But I would call it solid, not heavy. Love how you put a Sigma 1.4 on both cameras, nice touch. The lighting and set design are pro grade. Great work, love your videos!

[ljacobs]

Panasonic and Olympus lenses are smaller, lighter than and usually less expensive. Didn't care for the Sony for that reason as well as the more complex menu system.

[blabMOXkd]

I really appreciate the down-to-earth reviews and tips of all the equipment that you've shown us. Thank you so much for being authentic. It makes a huge difference.

[blender_wiki]

You can shot anamorphic with 4K photo mode on the GX85. Stabilizer work very good with any manual lenses.
For film student class is an incredible camera.

[michaelofmelrose]

Thanks for showing how they are almost same design. Your enthusiasm and desire to help & share shines thru!

[bandages]

Gotta love the tiny kit lenses, they come in clutch sometimes. Keep it up brother

[Followerof_YAH]

Markus thank you for your input. You are definitely a breath of fresh air from many out there.

[krillansavillan]

Hey Markus, we love your opinions - you don't need to give so much stuff away! I know it jives with your life motto of giving 10% but us true fans are here for the content.

[hectordejesus]

I should be picking up a gx85 in a few days. I like shooting m4/3. Keeps me pushing in my photography life.

[simpleeyemedia]

Markus, thank you for your great videos--keep up the great work! I don't think enough people just take a moment to say "thank you" to you.  You have this contagious energy when you talk about the things that you love. It's one of the many reasons I subscribed a while back to this channel.

Another great thing about those little GX85 cameras is that the slightly heavier weight might actually help you keep it steadier when shooting video.

[zwheels]

I love my gx85. It is pretty heavy for the size but, in my experience, it's still lighter with a pro zoom than an ASP-C. Plus, that dual IS means I can shoot handheld without rigging. That makes the camera super light by comparison.
But, as you said, it's better for video shooters and that's where my perspective comes from.

[trym]

You make up the weight in lenses. 45 1.8 that you love, telephoto is ton smaller and lighter.