The Pink Tax Myth isn't real! | Pink Tax Debunked

The Pink Tax Myth isn't real! | Pink Tax Debunked

The pink tax is generally brought up as another example of male privilege. Basically, they assert that gender pricing exists and that women are routinely charged more than men for essentially the same thing.

To be fair, there is some truth to this. For example, womens clothes tend to cost a bit more than mens. And there is also a Tampon tax. So, Pink Tax Proven, right? Not so fast. Because there are other instances where men pay more, like car and life insurance. You see, gender pricing goes both ways.
So lets look at a few pink tax examples, and see how much truth there is here. This is the pink tax explained and debunked, at least partially.

As always sources are down below.

Subscribe:

On bitchute:

Sources:

Insurance:

[suthinanahkist]

The pink tax isn't actually a tax as people can choose to purchase either the pricier product, less pricy item or nothing at all. This is a choice you get with the private sector, but not with the government.

[PoseidonAdventure]

You know what I think? I think people never stop complaining about things. I think that a feminist will see life through a feminist lens, and therefore reads into a woman’s product costing extra because of it being for a woman. Maybe a woman’s product costs more to manufacture? Maybe a particular color sells more, so the manufacturer ups the price of that in-demand color? I don’t believe it’s a pink tax, per se.

[ProbablyStonedComments]

Cause men don’t give a shit what color a razor is, for $2 less I’d buy the pink one…and a beer

[TheMaxer]

You hit it right on the head. If the man's razor does the exact same thing, women can just buy that one.

[januarysson]

The black bike is more expensive because black is cool. 😎

[Betweentheraindrops]

Great video. The point for explaining succinctly to feminists would be: if they’re the same product, buy the cheaper one. No? Why? You don’t think they’re the same product? The men’s products seem gross and don’t smell or feel good? So then they’re not the same product? So why should they be priced the same when yours has added comfort?

[retrogiftsuk]

I'm guessing that the blue scooter was a reduced price to shift stock that wasn't selling. We've all seen it in sales where some colours are reduced when others aren't. Different states have different laws regarding how long an item can still be advertised as being reduced (e.g. just because 2 years ago you sold an item at 50usd you can't still claim that a price of 25usd is an offer) so after some time a website must legally show the lower price as a regular price (they can no longer show the "was $50...") You showed this with the bike on Amazon, retailers set prices based on sales to try to prevent being left with stock that won't sell

[colleenkelly]

You actually think women don’t buy condoms?!? Have you even actually talked to a woman?

[FronteirWolf]

I spend nothing on a regular basis on my period. Underpants wash, and cloth pads and liners wash. Saves me a lot of money, and any money I do spend will be a long term investment, It's only expensive if you use disposables

[zachsheffield]

If anything men have to pay more for less expensive clothing places like old Navy!!

[kylesargent]

Men aren’t the only ones to buy condoms, often women will split the cost- if a man came to my house and we had sex I always provided the condom. Also I wonder how those stats change in marriage- every woman I know in a long term relationship who is not ready for pregnancy is on some form of birth control and they no longer use condoms due to personal preference and cost (including in my marriage). Women pay less to get into clubs and get free drinks because they are used to lure more men into the clubs who the club can charge more, aka using women as sexual objects to attract men. 🙄

[trippybruh]

This is why credit card companies love women.