3 Dynamic Income Strategies Anyone Can Use in Retirement

preview_player
Показать описание
Does it feel like you're being forced to plan around your income strategy in retirement rather than the strategy built around you and your goals? In this video today, we talk about the importance of dynamic strategies in retirement and show 3 simple strategies you can use on your own.

Timestamps:
0:00 3 Dynamic Income Strategies Anyone Can Use in Retirement
0:35 Why Static Spending Plans Are Ineffective
5:02 Are Retirees Forced to Think Too Conservative?
7:36 The Retirement Calculator Used in Today's Video
10:55 Dynamic Strategy #1
14:45 Dynamic Strategy #2
16:56 Dynamic Strategy #3
19:55 Considering a More Robust Strategy

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Always remember, "You Don't Need More Money; You Need a Better Plan"

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Great video. It has been my experience that the problem with Monte Carlo analysis is that people will look at the high-end outlier results and say “that’s nonsense, will never happen“ but then look at the worst case outlier results and are scared and believe very well could happen.

chumbawumba
Автор

I kind of like the idea of using guaranteed income like Social Security and pension for my needs and then taking a fixed percentage from my portfolio for wants. Not a big deal if my income fluctuates a bit from year to year.

mere_cat
Автор

Thank you for this content 😊 for me, this is eye opening. Much appreciated.

rsmard
Автор

Great discussion of opportunity costs starting around 6:00.

erickarnell
Автор

Great discussion of varying approaches to this important topic for people's consideraton. As usual, great content and easy to follow discussion. Thanks Eric. Have a great week. Larry, Central Valley, Ca.

ld
Автор

I totally agree with most of what you said. I am spending a lot more money now than in the future for sure. The travel budget alone is over 50K per year now, but in a couple of years that will be less than half. Since I don't have any debt, the wife and I will be very hard-pressed to also spend on many other things as we do now (health insurance since we are not under Medicare yet comes to mind, dinners, I am beginning to enjoy cooking at home and cars. Got my dream car so I am good to go). People need to realize the most important things in life are, health, family, friends, and time to enjoy it all.

stevejohnson
Автор

Excellent Video. I think the dynamic strategy you choose to be a very personal decision. I agree a more complex approach is best but hard to implement on your own.

kcnicely
Автор

Great video!!! Very informative. Thank you.

glockman
Автор

Thanks for sharing such valuable information! Just a quick off-topic question: My OKX wallet holds some USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?

FergusDavignon
Автор

Dynamic spending is a game changer and aligns with life whether that is unexpected or special expenses as well as the volatility of the market riding out the noise. It’s more adaptable and in the end with spending guardrails gives on more confidence in spending.

joramster
Автор

Good video. What do you think of Kitces' ratcheting (up only) withdrawal strategy?

dougb
Автор

Love the dynamic spending model. Andy and Tony at SG do a great job keeping me inline, but I’m always pushing to spend more! Not taking it with me!

Jeff-yyfe
Автор

1st and 2nd dynamic strategy are using $34k which is 3.4% of original balance. How was this calculated? Why not 3% or 3.6% ?

Andocus
Автор

The second strategy "endowment'' spending chart for the bad trial 1966 case at around the 16 minute mark, seems to show the annual spending floor is only ~$30K instead of the $34K mentioned in the video and as shown in the other charts ?

Is there a chart error, or am I misunderstanding this strategy ?
Otherwise, thanks for the great video !

jhacx
Автор

I don’t spend $8k per month now. I guess I won’t mind not spending it in retirement.

bvsjgqg
Автор

Thanks for this video. Interesting. Chart #1 appears about a 60/40 portfolio? Bengan's 4% study, used a 50/50 portfolio. What about increasing diversification of sub asset classes, would that increase the SWR? What about the effect of 1% + fees? Good point about Fire.

rickdunn
Автор

The 4% rule is outdated and irrelevant. Everyone has a different needs analysis on how much your annual expenses are. And annual expenses can change year to year. Especially with inflation. You first need to know how much you spend each year and how you can cover your expenses from your savings and social security. Your Expenses is the most important number you need to know during retirement.

DP-oluv
Автор

Sounds complicated, all these strategies. I'm going to look at what I need, then add buffer each year for misc and fun spending, then add it up and put it through the Montecarlo tests. If in the 90s, I'm not going to worry much about things. SS will be icing if it's there.

onlywenilaugh
Автор

Way too detailed . Keep it simple . Save more spend less so that 4 % will always work. If you can’t spend 4 % then the financial markets and advisors are FOS.

edwardloizides