Solving the TypeError 'NoneType' in Python 3.8: A Guide to Proper Type Checking

Struggling with the `TypeError 'NoneType'` in Python 3.8? Learn how to properly check types and iterate through data structures in Python with this comprehensive guide.
---

Visit these links for original content and any more details, such as alternate solutions, latest updates/developments on topic, comments, revision history etc. For example, the original title of the Question was: TypeError 'NoneType' even after a typecheck python 3.8

If anything seems off to you, please feel free to write me at vlogize [AT] gmail [DOT] com.
---
Solving the TypeError 'NoneType' in Python 3.8: A Guide to Proper Type Checking

When you're working on Python projects, there's nothing more frustrating than running into errors that can leave you scratching your head. One common error that developers encounter is the dreaded TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not iterable. This typically arises when you try to iterate over a None object rather than a valid iterable type. No one likes feeling stuck, especially when you're confident you've done your type checking. So, let's dive into the cause of this issue and how to effectively resolve it!

Understanding the Problem

The Error

In the code snippet shared by one of our fellow Python developers, the error cropped up during a for loop that attempts to iterate through a list of shipment items:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Despite performing a type check, the error still appears, indicating that order['shipmentItems'] may be None.

The Confusion

The confusion lies in the line:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

At first glance, this check seems reasonable because we are checking the type of shipmentItems. However, let's break down what's happening here.

Finding the Solution

Correct Type Checking

Instead of checking if the type itself is not None, you should directly verify if the object is not None. This is done using the following syntax:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This ensures that you are explicitly checking for the None value rather than the type of None.

Example Correction

Let’s revise the problematic piece of code:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This will prevent the TypeError from occurring if shipmentItems is indeed None.

Simplifying Your Code

For a more elegant solution, you can simplify the iteration process without needing to check the type explicitly by using the get method. This approach also allows for a default value if the key does not exist:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

Benefits of using get:

It avoids KeyErrors if the key is missing.

It provides an empty list as a default, so the loop runs without causing an error.

Understanding the Confusion Further

To see where the misunderstanding lies, consider this example:

[[See Video to Reveal this Text or Code Snippet]]

This demonstrates that while the type of None itself isn't None, the object order['shipmentItems'] certainly is. Hence, order['shipmentItems'] is None returns False, confirming that the initial approach to type checking was flawed.

Conclusion

To summarize, checking types in Python can often lead to confusion, especially with None. The easiest way to handle potential None values is to ensure that you're checking the object directly and using safe methods to access dictionary values. By following these guidelines, you'll not only resolve existing errors but also strengthen your Python coding practice.

Happy coding!