How Much Will $50 Trillion Reduce World’s Temperature? Sen. Kennedy Grills Deputy Energy Secretary

Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.) on Wednesday grilled Deputy Energy Secretary David Turk about the cost of green energy reforms during a Senate Appropriations Committee hearing.

-
-
-
-
---------------

---------------
-
-
💎Sign the petition to investigate, condemn, and reject the Chinese Communist Party

---------------------
⭕️Watch more:

---------------------

#World #Temperature #Kennedy #Deputy #Energy #Secretary

How Much Will $50 Trillion Reduce World’s Temperature? Sen. Kennedy Grills Deputy Energy Secretary
---------------

[rossbuchanan]

Spend 50 trillion dollars for nothing! What a waste of money! This climax lunacy has to stop now!

[scatpack]

So 25 years from now after spending trillions we will hear that we still have more work to do and we need to spend more.

[eigenvalue]

$50T won't do squat for a "problem" that nature goes through in cycles. That amount will, however, make lots of clowns very rich.

[garlandgranger]

I wish Kennedy would ask the secretary what the perfect temperature is for the planet because not one of these people know.

[pjhimself]

“It’s my job to know but I don’t have the estimates.” Who pays this man to be so incompetent ? Best question: “you don’t know, do you ?”

[jasonfox]

I'm not American but I think Mr Kennedy should be your country's next president because he actually wants to make a change plain and simple

[mrprutten]

News flash...the climate has never not been changing.

[judyirving]

Just by looking at him ya just know he is EVIL.

[simonbroddle]

It's easy to spend 50 trillion dollars of other people's money when there's no accountability. 🤦‍♂

[davidminter]

Carbon neutral is a place we don't have to go.

[Palsrible]

I don’t trust someone who starts a sentence with the word “So”

[bchristopher]

How can we be emitting carbon… I thought we were going to run out of oil by now? Remember?

[OriginalWhiteDevil]

We spend $50, 000, 000, 000, 000 to become carbon neutral, while China spends a fraction of that to build more cheap coal plants, how much does it lower global temperatures? The answer is it doesn't.

[jameshildebrand]

I certainly object to do anything. This is my fifth "10 years left". I already survived four previous "10 years left". I will so be a five times survivor of "10 years left"! I want that flex!

[richardharrold]

They either don't know what they're doing and following orders or won't be truthful due to the insanity of the plan.

[richardkev]

According to the IPCC, more than $100 trillion spent would result in a fraction of a degree temperature reduction.

[Ggzerbe]

I see there’s still no penalty for lying to Congress.

[jbj]

This guy is not even a good student of obfuscation. He can't even not answer questions with any believability or grace. His only method is becoming defensive. On the other hand, he's the perfect protege for his boss, the even more prickly Secretary of Energy Granholm who has never uttered a single legitimate point on the subject of "energy".

[grazynazambeanie]

Don't question him Mr Kennedy, jjust go with the flow, as long as they all get rich, they will be happy . This has nothing to do with saving the earth, it's about money in their pockets😊

[sharonusa]

How, exactly, do they intend to control the SUN?? All said, while the rainforest is continuously cut down.