When Stockfish says you missed mate

#chess #chessgame #chesscom

[TheSylphenheimGuy]

I reviewed a game once and stockfish gave me like 14 missed wins because I didn't take a pawn.

[Tht-guy]

We need bald-Niche once again! How else would I see the future?

[that_one_person]

Bro miss mate in 964 in his last vid 💀

[theodriggers]

"You missed mate in 62, 795"

[DefNotRealNauru]

Same happened to me when I did a brilliant move, missed mate in 2, but wins material

[patajch]

Most of those mates are actually easy, when you have a winning position, like your pieces attacking enemy king whike your's cozy you just calculate variants using this algorithm: checks, captures, attacks. Those moves are forced so not huge variation of moves avaliable for enemy, so you check his answer with the same algorithm, than your response, and boom, you found M2.

[thatonefirekestral]

That one time stockfish calculated mate in fifty three with only three white knights on the board

[azizbronostiq]

Ah yes, a blunder because and missed mate in 19 and now I can get mated in 76

[Hawkeyechess]

I wouldn't find these even if i was a piece in the board itself !

[CertifiedBread]

Wise man once told me “if you find a mate in 2 make it a mate in 14”

[Guywithblackpfp]

You should’ve SACRIFICE THE ROOK check then sacrifice the rook check, sacrifice the rook check sacrifice the rook check sacrifice the rook check

[thegamer]

That's so relatable AHAHAHAH HAPPENS TO ME ALWAYS

[JohnBlomer]

Funny how I saw the mate in 10 after the free rook. :)

[Andrewy]

My favorite is bludingering quang because i got tunnel visseron and forgate how ponds movie

[mihailoosos]

Im not really watching video because of cow picture on back💀

[vikrat]

These were hella easy except for the last one which I missed because I suck

[jacobcarrizales]

I mean minus mate in 10 it’s nothing crazy

[thealphabetsong]

I mean I get it
And don’t get me wrong, from a 500 rated perspective this is really funny
But all of these except the second one were kinda obvious tbh
And I would’ve at least played Bishop takes rook on the third one, makes no sense to lose and trade the rook on the back rank
Blundering the knight in the fourth one also makes no sense and there’s a free rook on the fifth