filmov
tv
Mandukya Upanishad with Karika - Session 21
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ea515/ea515c9ed8a43e536c789d65a0a80c7651020213" alt="preview_player"
Показать описание
The most significant aspect of the Upanishad “NETI , NETI” is discussed in the 26th verse.One NETI is to negate the physical body the MURTA universe. The other NETI is to negate the subtle body the AMURTA universe. Upanishad negates and leaves the truth for the seekers to understand that the one who is doing the negation ,the subject ,the Turiyam Atma is the only reality. Here the MIMASA analysis is over. Hereafter Gaudapadacharya logically establishes that the creation is not factual but seeming. The changeless God or Brahman cannot be the cause of creation as the very idea of cause denotes change. Upanishad says that Brahman is Satyam Jannam Anantham .There can never be a satisfactory explanation for the origination theory because any explanation will suffer from logical problems. If we can create a seeming dream world why can’t Brahman create a seeming waking world .Both have the conditional reality.
In the waking state as well as the dream state the seeming world does not exist separate from the Advaitam observer is the Upanishadic truth.
In the waking state as well as the dream state the seeming world does not exist separate from the Advaitam observer is the Upanishadic truth.