Solving Uber Frontend Interview Question | Interactive Shape | Part 2

In this video, we will optimise the solution we came up with in part 1. We will modify our solution so that it can render any grid, reduce computation time, and other improvements.

In part one, solve a front-end interview question from top companies like Uber. We will build an interactive shape based on the given data. The user can interact with the shape. We will take care of multiple edge cases, talk about effects, and lots of other fundamental concepts.

Try now using the links below

You can support our channel via:

************************************************************
Devtools Tech is a YouTube channel started as a collaborative effort among like-minded engineers to provide high-quality programming tutorials for free. We firmly believe in knowledge sharing and easy access to quality content for everyone. Hence, this channel is an effort to give back to the community and a step toward our belief -- "We rise by lifting others".

Team Members:
Yomesh Gupta

#javascript #ai #web #frontend #interviewquestions #devtoolstech #code #programming #developement #devtoolstech #code
***********************************************************

[syncmaster]

Hey! I remember commenting about the how this was kinda hard coded and would be nice for it to be dynamic. Happy to see you address those points in the follow video. As always great content!

[dipaksaha]

amazing content...can you bring some good projects video please

[priyanksinghal]

There is no trade-off here.
While flattening the array results in a time complexity of O(N), the N is different from that in the row and column approach. In the row and column approach, the time complexity is O(N^2), but the number of iterations is equivalent for both methods for any given matrix. This is because, for a flattened array, N = sqrt(N in the row-column approach).