Correlation: Pearson vs. Spearman

preview_player
Показать описание
How do correlation analyses work? What is the difference between the parametric Pearson correlation and the nonparametric Spearman's Rank correlation? In a practical example the two analyses yield opposite results: One is significantly positive, the other significantly negative. This surprising result is explained graphically and by looking at the data set, but without using any mathematical formulas. After two influential outliers are excluded, the two coefficients arrive at the same result.

Contact me, e. g. to discuss (online) R workshops / trainings / webinars:

Playlist: Music chart history
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thanks for sharing. Very impressive example - the outliers really mess up Pearson's correlation, and Spearman's correlation is not sensitive with outliers.

brendali
Автор

Great example - I selected the right analysis for my study!

Brickkzz
Автор

Thank you! Very helpful for my understanding.

julesdrums
Автор

I still do not understand. When I should use Pearson and when I should use Spearman?

billytbsiang
Автор

Can we do a correlation between two different types of variables? Like linear vs ordinal?

kavanpuranik
Автор

THANks! BUT how to check the discrete missing value automatically in a statistical method by SPASS if there is a large amount of data ?

krauseyuan
Автор

He sounds a bit like max verstappen lol. Good video tho helped me understand.

jennirose