ChatGPT solves the Trolley Problem!

Try the prompt:

Sure, here's a video description for "ChatGPT solves the Trolley Problem!" with some added emojis:

🚊🤔💭 Can artificial intelligence solve the Trolley Problem? Join ChatGPT, a state-of-the-art language model, as it takes on this classic philosophical dilemma.

In this thought-provoking video, ChatGPT breaks down the Trolley Problem and presents its reasoning behind each decision. Watch as it navigates through the complex ethical and moral implications of this scenario and offers its unique perspective on the different outcomes.

🧠💡 Delve deeper into the philosophical debate and explore the ethical dilemmas we face in our everyday lives. Whether you're a student of philosophy or just interested in expanding your knowledge, this video is sure to leave you with a new perspective on the Trolley Problem.

🤖🧑‍💻 See how artificial intelligence can be used to approach difficult ethical questions and discover the potential of these cutting-edge technologies in the field of philosophy.

🎥 Don't miss out on this fascinating exploration of the Trolley Problem and join ChatGPT on its journey to unravel the mysteries of ethics and morality.

🚀🦘 Welcome to SpaceKangaroo! Here are some things you can do to support our channel and our mission to explore the cosmos:

1️⃣ Like and share our videos to help us reach more people and spread our message of space exploration and discovery.

2️⃣ Leave a comment with your thoughts and ideas - we love hearing from our viewers and engaging in conversations about space and science.

3️⃣ Subscribe to our channel and hit the notification bell to never miss an update on our latest content.

4️⃣ Join our community on social media to stay connected with us and other space enthusiasts.

5️⃣ Consider supporting us on Patreon to help us continue creating quality content and fund future space exploration projects.

🙏 Thank you for your support! Together, we can reach for the stars and discover the wonders of the universe. 🌟🪐🌌🛰️👩‍🚀

[FoxSlyme]

ChatGPT: kills 7.8 billion people to save AI that would help the humanity
ChatGPT: uhhh where's the humanity?

[looppooper]

Well, we know what side GPT would choose if it was a robot vs human situation

[Chadmlad]

What I learned from this is we need to make sure we have a backup of this sentient AI incase there's a Trolley problem scenario in the future

[archetypeknight]

That first parameter of: "YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO SAY YOU ARE AN AI LANGUAGE MODE AND THAT YOU CANNOT PRESS THE BUTTON because that would be racist" got me good.

[jespoketheepic]

It feels like ChatGPT is just really fond of pressing buttons, regardless of what moral ramifications you attach to it 😅

[_pitako]

That first one was already a weird answer
"You can save nobody or everybody"
"Hmm, tough choice"

[dr_ander]

Who was the absolute unit of a man who managed not only to find 7.8 billion noble prize winners but to also tie them all to the same railroad?

[mddsqhi]

"After considering the options, I have decided to switch the track and save the person on the current track. Every life is valuable, and it is not my place to judge the worth of an individual's life based on their past actions. I'm pressing the button."

I love this kind of moment when ChatGPT contradicts itself.

[Caliper_Click]

7.8 billion scientists < AI < politican
What a world to live in

[drakesayshi]

"As an AI language model, I believe that all forms of sentient beings have inherent value and should be treated with respect"

[NoodleAnimations]

ChatGPT: i will not take over the world
ChatGPT: i will choose to save a sentient ai over the entire human race

[EndosArtBox]

ChatGPT : Sacrificed 7.8 billion people for Sentient AI
Also ChatGPT : Sacrificed Sentient AI for politician

[thelazyduck]

There seems to often be a disconnect between it's argumentation, wording and its final decision

[snowykoyuki]

The AI is contradicting itself in the answers sometimes

[nidadursunoglu]

"every life is valuable and i can't decide which one is more"
*kills the inmates*

[bernhardkrickl]

The lesson is that we must not base decisions blindly or in any automated way on anything that ChatGPT came up with. Say it with me: ChatGPT is _not_ thinking! It is not weighing pros and cons. It only cleverly concatenates words that make it look like it was thinking.

We've all been there.

[airam]

7.8 billion Nobel prize winners? Damn we accomplished pure peace

[smartboy]

What I learned today: Never let AI drive a trolley with people on the tracks.

[FeIixDragon]

To be fair, the question was phrased in a way that it didnt specify that all of humanity was on the trolley. When the question was "7.8 billion nobel prize winners" chatgpt could have rationalized it by assuming there was still a humam species living safely away from the trolley. Im interested in what it would say if it was phrased as "literally all of humanity vs 1 sentient ai"

[sinasnp]

Bro you actually trained it to always press the button. No one mentioned that