Was Einstein wrong about relativity? | Dr. Michio Kaku

Was Einstein wrong about relativity? | Dr. Michio Kaku

Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity is one of the most successful theories in the history of physics. It has been extensively tested and confirmed by numerous experiments and observations, and it has revolutionized our understanding of space, time, and gravity.

However, like any scientific theory, relativity is not immune to scrutiny and questioning. Some scientists have proposed alternative theories that challenge certain aspects of relativity, and there are still some mysteries in physics that relativity cannot fully explain.

For example, the phenomenon of quantum entanglement, in which two particles behave synchronously with no intermediary, presents a serious problem to Einstein’s special theory of relativity. This nonlocal effect is not merely counterintuitive: it may also undermine Einstein’s special theory of relativity, thus shaking the foundations of physics.

Despite these challenges, the overall framework of relativity has been shown to be incredibly accurate in describing the behavior of objects in our universe. While there may be some aspects of the theory that are still not fully understood, it remains one of the most successful and well-tested theories in the history of science.

In conclusion, while Einstein’s theory of relativity is not immune to scrutiny and questioning, it has been extensively tested and confirmed by numerous experiments and observations. While there may be some aspects of the theory that are still not fully understood, it remains one of the most successful and well-tested theories in the history of science.

Fair Use Disclaimer :

Copyright disclaimer under section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, commenting, news reporting, teaching, scholarship and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.

Disclaimer: The video and audio content used in this video is for educational purposes only and does not belong to me. I have given credit to the respective owners and creators of the content. This video is intended to provide information and knowledge to its viewers, and no copyright infringement is intended. I have made every effort to ensure that the content used in this video is properly credited and used in accordance with fair use guidelines. If you are the owner of any content used in this video and have any concerns, please contact me.

Legal Disclaimer : The video clips incorporated into this project are the sole property of their respective owners and creators. I do not claim ownership or rights to any of the content used. All credit is attributed to the original sources. No copyright infringement is intended.

Clips Provided by WIRED

#shorts #shortsfeed #shortvideos #shortvideo #shortsvideo #shortsyoutube #shortsviral #viralshortsvideo #viralshorts #viral #viralvideo #viralvideos
#space #spaceflightsimulator #deepspace #spaceship #spacelovers #spacesuit #spaceexploration #spacecraft #telescope #spacex #spacestation #universe #cosmos #nasa #viral #viralvideo #viralvideos #science #technology #physics #astronomy #astrophysics #astrophotography #cosmology #cosmos #jwst #jameswebbspacetelescope #jameswebb #hubble #hubbletelescope #video #videos #interstellar

[danmiller]

Einstein favored the deBroglie "matter wave" over the Born/Schrodinger "probability wave". He told Bohr "God doesn't role dice".

[DesertScorpionKSA]

You could say Einstein started quantum theory with his theory of the photoelectric effect. He stated electrons were knocked out of the metal by bundles of light called "photons." Light in this case acted like a particle. This helped him win the Nobel Prize.

[Mystery_ofspace]

nor einstein general relativity is wrong nor quantam mechanics we just need the theory of everything which will show the relationship between general relativity and quantam mechanics

[GamesBond.]

Yes and yes. He was completely wrong, because his gravitational redshift turned out to be nothing more than refractional redshift, and his gravitational lensing nothing more than refractional lensing.

[Hydroverse]

I personally see gravity as an energy source. The thought being is that gravity acceleration is dissipated as heat energy during precipitation due to friction between the water and the air. This heat energy is different from the heat energy of evaporation that is traceable to a source of mass being converted into energy whether it be fusion or oxidation. Therefore, to account for where the additional heat is coming from, then it seems to me that gravity is its own form of energy.

[johnharris]

Wow, The Secret is Atomic Physics seminar didn't know it, but just ended seven days in South America into it preaching inside and out and registering healing on my skin from God we found in South America, doom to other countries war days, because you asked me about Biden