Reforming the peer review process

preview_player
Показать описание
"The peer-review process is fallible, slow, and biased, and it takes advantage of the scientific community’s altruism. We need to keep pushing the conversation forward about making publishing more equitable, timely, accessible, and fair. An obvious and easy way to begin is to pay the experts who perform the peer reviews. Either the journals need to reform their practices, or the medical community should establish an alternative."

Andrew Spector is a neurologist.

Hosted by Kevin Pho, MD, The Podcast by KevinMD shares the stories of the many who intersect with our health care system but are rarely heard from. Welcome to The Podcast by KevinMD.

Subscribe on Apple Podcasts:

Subscribe on Google Podcasts:

Subscribe on Spotify:
Рекомендации по теме