Honda HR-V Acceleration test 0-60 mph / 0-100 Km/H | NOT SO FAST!

A larger 2.0-liter 4-cylinder engine powers every new Honda HR-V, producing 158 horsepower (SAE net @ 6,500 rpm) and 138 lb.-ft. of torque (SAE net @ 4,200 rpm). Compared to the 1.8-liter 4-cylinder in the first-generation HR-V, the new engine is more powerful (+17 hp and +11 lb.-ft. of torque), delivering improved drivability, refinement, and lower emissions.

Price As Tested: 2023 HR-V EX-L NAVI Crystal Black Pearl exterior, Black Leather Interior $45,466.86

C/D TEST RESULTS
60 mph: 9.4 sec
1/4-Mile: 17.3 sec @ 85 mph
100 mph: 26.0 sec
Results above omit 1-ft rollout of 0.3 sec.
Rolling Start, 5–60 mph: 9.6 sec
Top Gear, 30–50 mph: 4.7 sec
Top Gear, 50–70 mph: 6.4 sec
Top Speed (C/D est): 115 mph

#hondahrv
#hrv

[TheKingkingg]

Awesome cuv and Honda vehicles were never about straight line drag racing not even nsx or S2000, or type R rather for racing tracks or twisted roads

[aaz]

My brain tells me it's over 12 seconds, but I didn't use a stopwatch lol

[Video-coeu]

Like the CVT's response to the Honda City, which seemed very heavy

[xxxpensive]

Sounds like the cvt is holding the engine back.

[HULK]

We bought a 2025 HRV EXL AWD very Comfortable it wasn’t meant to be a Race Car it’s a commuter car. We also Own a Honda Pilot EXL AWD these cars are known for Reliability long lasting cars .We Sold our 2005 Honda Pilot 300, 000 Miles still drove like New take that test to other automakers that produce cars these days other than Toyota know for Reliability as Well.

[vlz.matthew]

the honda hrv and the nissan rogue sport should race to see which is slower lmao... this was literally like over 10 seconds to 60

[kitbones]

I recently went from driving a '19 Civic Si on the daily to a '24 HR-V. Yes, it's absolutely slow as crap! That said, after having driven it daily for the last several months, you kind of get used to it. The CVT really just holds it back off the line, so you have to account for that. Overall, it's not that bad. The CVT does a much better job of accelerating for passing than an automatic would. The engine breaking is smoother and less noticeable than a car that would have to downshift. My only issues has been gas mileage, but I've been able to adjust my driving style a bit to squeeze an average of about 35 MPG out of it on the highway, which is really impressive for a non-hybrid SUV.

[mhkhing]

This is probably the non-turbo model. That first 0-60km/h could be slower than a Prius

[JohnNathanShopper]

Is this in Japan or Europe? 0-100kph in 15 seconds has to be a 1 liter engine.

[jistarrz]

That's just sad. In my country we get the 1.5 turbo with 170hp 😂

[AIGeneratedUser]

If it had a normal auto I wouldn’t care about it being so slow

[JaZoN_XD]

Lol at least there's VTEC crossover xD

[ninevahkeith]

The make them slow because the people that buy them need fuel economy and not acceleration. That also alows them to be perfect first cars

[anthonyabdo]

First as an owner of the previous 1.8l one its slighty faster holding onto its rpm (no fake shifts) Aussie ZRV (aka America hrv) turbo 8sec 0-100 hybrid 6.8 0-100 jap built

[TMS]

Perfect vehicle for karens and soccer moms.

[robertduklus]

looks like honda put PDK transmission in hrv. wow.

[bonjournaste]

Honda has really lost it's way.. Such an uninspired effort.. Haven't seen such lazy exterior design in a long time.. For a parts bin car, they could have done anything and it would have been better than this.