Python Decorators 3: Turning a function into a class instance

Sebastian my brother. You're an incredible instructor. Respect from Boston.

[bejerky]

Your way of teaching Python is one of the best I've seen on YouTube! Keep up the great work! 👍😉

[hamidhamidi]

Thanks Sebastiaan for a grate way of explaining difficult subject. U R grate

[damiendivittorio]

I finally feel that I understand how decorators are constructed. Thanks for your work!

[benyaminyakobi]

Thank you very much! I'm glad that I've found your channel!

[thebuggser]

A very interesting application of decorators, and very elegantly explained.

Thanks!

[eshaankirpal]

You are amazing, Sebastiaan. You make complex concepts so easy to digest. Am curios to know your research and learning methodology.

Explain that one day, please.

[xenatronics]

very usefull and very interresting to learn

[raccoonteachesyou]

Thank you ! I've watched a lot of your Python videos, they are very clear and I understand very clearly !
Thanks for your work, hope you do some again :D

[jacobscrackers]

How would you 'wrap' a class decorator using the functools.wraps decorator demonstrated earlier?
Thanks for the interesting and useful series.

[swadhikarc]

cool feature taught in super cool manner. appreciate it.!

[peasant]

wow this is really cool, thanks for your awesome videos super helpful.

[fuanka]

Good information, thanks.
What about passing the decorated function's arguments to the decorator?

[comprycv]

Sir it would be really helpful if you make a video on metaclasses in python..

[martynasvenckus]

Great video. I have one question, though. Why do you define instance variables with underscores? For example, self._memory instead of self.memory?

[prashantchouksey]

Fantastic man you are the best. Thank you so much.

[parok]

I want to use Elephant on mulitple functions, how can I make it memorize as well?

[brendananderson]

I'm guessing a global statement is preferable when having only one local variable parameter of a module method be unreachable. I'm guessing global statements only become a clutter when there's a lot of local variables that become unreachable in a function. That then could lead to global variables become more of a distraction in reading the code. Or if there's a lot of nesting it could cause more of the same local variables to become unreachable again. Anyways, thanks for the video, I'm just trying to figure in which use case scenario this would be useful in. Because atm, I don't think I need it for a function I'm working on. I think since it is only one local variable that is nested in a try statement using a global variable won't cause any issues really.

[chloed]

How to do the same with a parametrisable decorator ?