Social Justice and Far Left Ideology Is Corrupting Science

preview_player
Показать описание
Far Left Ideology Is Infecting Science And Becoming Policy. We can see it in various forms. Fighting against Nuclear energy, fighting against GMO, and the most recent example denying biological dimorphism in humans.

These beliefs then get pushed into the mainstream and become policy and sometimes even law. But the news and most people would tell you its conservatives who deny science when the truth is science denial is prevalent in all political ideologies.

Social justice ideologies are apparently becoming prevalent in Universities where academics are predominantly left wing and hold regressive and ideological views that interfere with science.

#FarLeft

SUPPORT JOURNALISM. Become a patron at

Make sure to subscribe for more travel, news, opinion, and documentary with Tim Pool everyday.

MY GEAR

FOLLOW ME
Bitcoin Wallet: 13ha54MW2hYUS3q1jJhFyWdpNfdfMWtmhZ

SEND STUFF HERE

Tim Pool
330 Washington Street - PMB 517
Hoboken, NJ 07030
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Anyone who goes to the doctor and denies there is biological sex should be sent for a psychiatric assessment. If they're not then the doctor needs to be interviewed by a panel from the Medical Board and his licence suspended

guydecervens
Автор

I felt like I lost braincells when you showed the clip of the professor denying biological sex.

AnchoriteWolf
Автор

All you need is to look at Bill Nye. His old show had an episode on gender. Based on biology. His new show is completely different, and based on feelings. Dangerous times we are headed to.

jljr
Автор

And they blamed actual Nazism for promoting psuedo science

johnhenry
Автор

"Facts don't care about your feelings."
-Universal Truth

twistedlight
Автор

A historian of medicine? That's right up there with a mechanic of medicine or a mathematician of medicine. Studying history doesn't make you any authority in the practice or theory of medicine, even if the history you focus on is on the topic of medicine throughout history.

cormoran
Автор

This should be a crime against humanity. Obscuring and falsifying knowledge is a universal sin that should be shunned by all.

AAAAAA-lxcl
Автор

The overarching problem is the corruption of our institutions of expertise.

cooter
Автор

The reason why nobel prizes are systematically being given to older discoveries in hard sciences is because nowadays there are a whole lot of ridiculous and extremely irrelevant work being done. The new works in physics for instance boils down to grabbing your favourite theory, slightly changing it (appending a new term, computing a perturbation of, or even synthetizing new materials only slightly different) and publishing. This torrent of papers overwhelms anyone seeking for quality work, thus obscuring serious theories.
You can thank the "democratization" of academia for that (which lowered the standards of your typical graduation courses a lot) and the shift to a "productive metric" of quantity over quality. This became the norm pretty much worldwide.

jimjohn
Автор

Ironically, the left calls out religion, but they created their groups filled with different "denominations." I looked at, for example, feminism and christianity. They have different idealogoies sure, but the structures are built the same.

Christianity has different branches that stem from three main ones Protestant, Catholic, and Orthodox. Feminism has one branch that turned into marxist feminism, radical feminism, liberal feminism, and even conservative feminism. Each one calls out the other. Just like Christianity, each branch claims their truth is better than the others. Which would make someone confused, you would think which one is correct.

Each one would pull at you to believe in their ideology. If you don't believe in religion, it would seem the human mind tries a way to make one.

assassinaquilus
Автор

Everything you said in the first minute needs to be broadcast to the masses.

classickmusik
Автор

A historian of medicine is not a medical doctor, nor a scientist. In this case he is rather a purveyor of confirmation bias and ideology. Thus this historian of medicine is not a valid source of scientific or medical fact. Furthermore, what data does he cite.

notamouse
Автор

The fact is that people on both sides of the political spectrum tend to ignore scientific evidence when it threatens their worldview.

worsethanjoerogan
Автор

I don't "deny" global warming. I question global warming. Scientific ideas are always open to questioning.

eugenemclean
Автор

The most common complaints about the right not accepting science is climate change and evolution. There aren't that many people who deny evolution and as for climate change it's a straw man. The majority of conservatives are just skeptical as to what we should really be doing and if humans are a primary cause. Not conforming to climate change completely doesn't mean you deny it completely.

parzivalhowler
Автор

I'm triggered that Pluto is no longer a planet. We need to start a petition and file some lawsuits until they change the scientific explanation of what a planet is.

TheOldKevin
Автор

Tim even with medical intervention men can never grow offspring inside them.

aaron
Автор

This guy is not a scientist hes a HISTORIAN not a scientist and yes historians get political too.

ulissesarredondo
Автор

My God... where is this world heading to...

Alex-tnpv
Автор

It’s very problematic to normalize mental illness.

argonaut_jay