Hermeneutical Problems 101: Super Imposing #reformedtheology #provisionism #election

In this video I expose one of the Hermeneutical errors found in Provisionism. Leighton and many will use the meaning, intention, or definition of another passage and bring that on top of (Super Imposing) the initial passage they were explaining. In this video I show an example of what that looks like and how to detect it. Thank you so much for taking the time to watch the video. Please Subscribe, Comment and Like. God Bless.

#blessgod #ephesians1 #biblicalvideos #christalone #bible #youtuber #christianmessages #romans828 #biblicalteaching #teacher #christianity #exegesisThank you so much for taking the time to watch the video. Please Subscribe, Comment and Like. God Bless.

[jchan]

So Flowers is promoting the idea that God's plan before the foundation of the world was to possibly or maybe choose people for adoption depending on those who maybe put their faith in Christ?

[reformedpilgrim]

Good video, brother! Leighton is all over the place.

[CosmicSeptic]

Sorry, brother, but it’s hard for me to see how you would not be super imposing, especially in your previous responses to Alana L. In the one where you mainly focus on Eph. 1, you seem to discuss John 6 & John 10 more than Ephesians (and those are from a very different context and are from different authors).

It’s one thing to use cross-referencing, which is a useful and necessary tool. It’s another to super impose or to force our already-adopted system onto the text. It seems like you are doing the same thing while claiming that only Provisionists are. Maybe you could help me understand the difference between what you two are doing. (Not a Provisionist or a Calvinist).

[ManassehJones]

Literally, its called Flesh-O-Gesis. A carnal minds interpretation of scripture.