Pete Williams: Amy Coney Barrett Is Being ‘Overcautious’ During Supreme Court Questioning | NBC News

preview_player
Показать описание
Pete Williams explains how Amy Coney Barrett is being overcautious during questioning at the Supreme Court after she was asked if a president has the right to delay an election, and responds that if the question come before her she would "have to study it."

Connect with NBC News Online!

Pete Williams: Amy Coney Barrett Is Being ‘Overcautious’ During Supreme Court Questioning | NBC News
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

She is aware of people who are playing politics

herberttwiine
Автор

If this was a fair process, there would be no notes for either side other than questions. She didn't have any and still did circles around them.

michaelschaefer
Автор

If she doesn't answer, how can you confirm her

nancydouglas
Автор

Her answer of "well it may come before me" as an excuse not to answer Roe v Wade is pathetic. Any subject could come before the Court.

Miss_Attitude_
Автор

Why won't she answer the questions? So noone knows what she stands for. If she doesn't answer, she shouldn't get confirmed

nancydouglas
Автор

Over cautious! Isn’t that what we need in a Supreme Court judge?

grossherman
Автор

We she told Diane Feinstein “I know exactly why you’re asking this question” you could see the smirk on Feinstein as if she had been figured out!

albertpatino
Автор

Senator Whitehouse Rocks !! Graham Looks Worried !!!😷

soniapineda
Автор

She is cautious to questions with obvious answers because her answers is not in line with the obvious answer. ie she would rule in ways that we would not acceptable.

nickl
Автор

She is patently unqualified by the only reason that matters; she, like a
cynical opportunist would accept this job under the pall of such
controversy. It's that simple, given that these hearings are a crime
against the American people, her only rationale for accepting the job is
that she wants power. This fundamental character deficit should be
obvious to all and will be an enduring stain on her.

erickborling
Автор

"over cautious" She Answers Nothing, coz she would be exposed as a Fraud

napoleonbonaparte
Автор

Even though the judge is fully aware that she and her kids were exposed to Trump and others who tested positive at the Rose Garden event, she is still bringing her kids to these hearings. This makes me question her judgement on health issues

Saidwhatisaid
Автор

It's funny how the hate towards this woman revolves around her religion. Little hypocritical of the so called "inclusive"

drsuffcatr
Автор

She just has to make sure she doesn't give any wrong answers. Right answers are not really required as Republicans will get her confirmed anyway

princesskunji
Автор

Vote blue if you don't want Trump's junkie for another 4 years.

sarahrose
Автор

If this is the only thing you hear. We Are All Screwed If Joe Hiden Wins

Lucifer_Morningstar
Автор

This judge is already on record as being apposed to abortion. If she is confirmed we will be going back to days of back-street abortion and women dying. And rump get his revenge against women.

mjohn
Автор

I vote for you for relief society president not the supreme court

enckidoofalling
Автор

is it legal to move forward with the scotus hearing while we are in the election process? Former President Obama was stopped from nominating a scotus during his time way before the election. Where is the consistent law and order in America?

diesel
Автор

Or she would be accused of some false transgressions from her highschool days. You know like the Dems usual play book but you aren't in charge this time.

ditch