Brady Basics

preview_player
Показать описание
Criminal Procedure video introduction to the basic holding and reasoning of Brady v. Maryland, a U.S. Supreme Court case that sets some of the basic rules of information exchange in criminal proceedings.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Thank you so very much. This was extremely helpful

Brutaga
Автор

Thank you Professor Wright for this video. Providing your knowledge and expertise on the Law without charging US.

STILLSTANDING
Автор

My brother is being held on false allegations and prosecutors are definitely withholding evidence that proves he's innocent, but i don't want to wait until after he's found guilty bc the jury didn't get the whole truth. It takes two years to rewrite their wrong. How do we prevent it before it's too late?

mlpdunaway
Автор

it's a great presentation and explanation, but does Brady work the other way too? if the defence has incriminating info on the defendant, do they have to volunteer it to the prosecution?

tonyclifton
Автор

Prof. Wright- ty so much for your videos!! You have no idea how much you’re helping me, I’m in a 14wk intensive to attain my paralegal- 2yrs of education in less than 2 semesters! You are helping expand on the material in a very user-friendly way. Ty ty ty, sir. 🤓📚⚖️👏🏽 & you’re in NC!! 💪🏽👏🏽

😎🤘🏽💋🔮⚖️

shannap.lawnerd
Автор

Judges who are about to apply for higher courts should first watch this video, because they could be asked to explain what a _Brady_ motion is.

OTRTrader
Автор

What about Brady requirements during the plea-bargaining process? Where a case never goes to trial? Do the rules remain the same?

stephaniesanders
Автор

Some judges doesn’t listen to people who are telling the truth. And lawyers withheld information.

epmetriusharris
Автор

Wondering how comfortable Mr Red Baseball Cap Guy is going to be In Court when he has to remove his Headdress, seeing as he can’t remove it now.

Blackwater_House
Автор

Sometimes you also have judge who is in bed with the prosecutor and serious prosecutorial misconduct is happening :)

vzepc
Автор

Why go to law school and spend ridiculous amount of money when I have the internet to soak up all the information lol

williamarana
Автор

I’m sure there is at least 1 “student” in that wf class that isn’t paying attention 🔧💊.

AConcernedCitizen
Автор

Great, informative video. Thank you!!!

mzflowerbucket
Автор

This helped with my social studies mock trial lol thx

jaocbh.
Автор

What license to practice law? There is none. You are a card carrying member of the BAR association, that's not a license to practice law.

GregJoshuaW
Автор

9:38 - He wanted to say “that’s a _Brady Violation”_ LOL would’ve been funny if he said “WoW that is a violation and in the future we will call it a “Brady Violation!”

junivanofdragonia
Автор

Your portrayal of Justice Douglas at 10:00 is very unfair. Yes! Douglas was a liberal. He believed in personal liberty, the freedom to act as you choose to act. He was an outdoorsman, he loved nature. And he was a romantic; he married a very much younger woman than he and together they shared a public life of considerable happiness.
Now Chief Justice Roger B. Tawney was a beaut. His biography shows he was probably insanely prejudiced in favor of slavery. He was certainly no renaissance man as was Douglas.
And Conservative Justice David Souter who retired from the court at a young age to his ancestral home in the New Hampshire woods, locking the door behind him, and seldom to be seen by the world again.
So take YOUR prejudice out of your pocket, Teach, and stick it up someplace where the sun don't shine!

karamazovkid