Did You Know This About 'My Cousin Vinny?' #shorts

Edited with Filmora9

This video is protected under Fair Use.

Social Media Links

#shorts #mycousinvinny

[robertszekely]

Correct in saying that this ruling may have been subject for appeal. However, even real judges make decisions that that are appealed in real courts.

[cslloyd]

Nobody ever said Herman Munster was a good judge.

[IDBTitanosaurus]

Yup! For purposes of dramatic effect, the judge made reversible error. It’s subtle, but it also implies that judges willingly make reversible error all the time.

It sucks, but it happens a lot.

[niradnagrom]

For me this movie is one of those that if it's on tv I have to sit down and watch it no matter how many times I see it. I love this movie and the acting by all involved is just awesome! One of my most favorite movies!

[enriqueterrazas]

Crazy because they just showed my cousin Vinny in my lawschool and encouraged all of us to watch it 😂

[alexrmz]

They say the same about legally blonde. Two of my favorite films

[AndrewLWilson]

The showrunner did an interview stating that this was added in response to pressure from the studio to have a "Surprise witness" (The automotive expert). He didn't want to do it because it would be inaccurate to allow it as it was in the movie. So he added this scene with the exact objection that would normally be sustained in order to keep it SOMEWHAT realistic as well as sticking it to the studio.

[jonjahr]

I had a friend who's a lawyer describe the film to me as "the greatest example of everything that should never happen in court"

[suds]

I realized this when I first viewed the film. It's a no-brainer.

[carlosc]

How is that an "inaccuracy"? Is it impossible for a judge to make a mistake or something?

[infernalone]

Remember this was after the judge found out Jerry Gallo was dead, so he thinks Vinny's a fraud

[piter]

I don't care about the lawyer...i love Marisa ❤❤❤❤

[GoatOfGaming]

The last 2 videos involved the word cousin in one way or another

[TomAZ]

Could the judge have done this intentionally, because he believed the defendants were innocent, and would give them a chance to appeal or get the case overturned?

[christianfrost]

Except that real judges do this all the time. The fact that the judge tells Vinny that he knows he has thought out this objection, is grounds to Overrule the objections so long as he provides Vinny the same curticy when he brings forward a rebuttal witness.

[steelerstitles]

I admit that, given that the charges involve homicide, the admission of the state's expert's testimony over objection might cause reversal, but, given the fact that the defense didn't request discovery, or move for a continuance, it would more likely be on the basis of ineffective assistance of counsel.

[steelerstitles]

If Pesci didn't request discovery initially, then he can't, in general, object to not being provided with information regarding the state's expert. But, in reality, a homicide case wouldn't go that quickly to trial anyway. And Pesci would have been removed by the court and replaced by someone who knew what he/she was doing.

[hippiemama]

That would be a mistake that you would want your students to know about, wouldn't it? It would be a useful mistake.

[xanderx]

How many court room comedies are there?

[a.m.]

SCOTUS recently made a ruling on a hypothetical case brought forth by a person with no website company and fake filings listing a heterosexual man who has been married for over 10 years as the homosexual seeking her services. Safe to say that the judicial branch is now involved in making their own laws independent of whether injury was caused.