Progressive Appears on Daily Wire, It Doesn't Go Well

--David appears on The Michael Knowles Show on The Daily Wire network
---
---
Leave a Voicemail Line: (219)-2DAVIDP
---
David tech:

-Timely news is important! We upload new clips every day! Make sure to subscribe!

Broadcast on March 24, 2022

#davidpakmanshow #davidpakman #michaelknowles

[MrVara]

6:41 Knowles did NOT backtrack. Pakman clearly saw he was losing the debate and stonewalled by calling Knowles dishonest. Love how he couldn't define woman or man but then at the end said "let's talk man-to-man." Ironic.

[jimengle]

How about Lindsey's totally unconstitutional question about her religion? It was literally illegal as discribed in the first amendment; "the government shall have no religious test....".

[Makeaocbartendagain]

I did debate in high school. The first thing you're supposed to do is define terms so that the debate can even happen. It's not a rhetorical trick. It's a necessity.

[MaxandTheoShow]

He asks people he interviews a test question. "Did trump win the 2020 election" as some sore sanity check. Then when asked if he can answer what a woman is, he just says he doesn't play the definition game. I think David is insane.

[AANasseh]

David came across hostile and snarky the whole interview. I don’t know why he decided to do the interview if he was so dismissive. If he didn’t’ want to answer questions he should have proposed a topic to talk about. He says I don’t want to define woman as I want to talk about politics. Two seconds later, he says: “This is man to man!” LOL!

[Eiind]

I really don't understand the whole "Doesn't go well" clickbait thing. It went great. It wasn't the best dialog but more then ok. I have listened to David for several years, but I have to say Michael came across allot less combative and smug then David.

[edwardkanniah]

Interesting that David refuses to be definitive while attempting to stubbornly define his position.

[thecoolgee]

This is crazy that pakman thinks he got the better of this.

[vladimirofsvalbard]

How David Pakman STILL has a show after all these years reminds me that we have a never ending supply of dumb voters.

[fbfc]

The dismissive avoidance tactic is used often by David. That is not debating in good faith.

[genechamson]

The inability or unwillingness to provide a definition of what is a woman was exactly the point Knowles was trying to make. And Pakman walked right into the trap.

[johnbayman]

Pakman, "...I don't 'do' dictionary, I 'do' politics..." then Pakman has the complete lack of self-awareness to say--wait for it: "...by definition..." Yikes, and these are serious people?

[mito._]

Meh, this is one of those areas where I agree with conservatives. You can't redefine words to mean whatever you want them to mean. Exclusionary terms that help distinguish unique characteristics are not derogatory, and should be accepted as such.
Having a free license to change definitions to personal interpretation invalidates the very premise of contract law.
If a judge nominated for SCOTUS fell for something this trivial, they shouldn't be working in any legal capacity.

[fricasepolitico]

Michael Knowles was right, he did not specify "legal definition"

[bengrohmann]

David’s entire debate strategy: “Maybe If I am EXTREMELY dismissive, arrogant, condescending, and disrespectful, my audience will think I’m smart!”

[danelson]

I did all of the things that David Pakman encouraged the audience to do (re-listening to what others actually said or asked) and in every case, Pakman was wrong. Pakman has never spoken on any issue without intentionally lying. It is crazy to me that people can have confidence in their beliefs when they know they are intentionally lying and misrepresenting things.

[pawekopytek]

Well, he was right about the "backtracking". He said at 6:36 "just tell me what a woman is: from a legal perspective, a constitutional perspective, a philosophical, I mean, whatever..." so he really did mean just any ("whatever") definition, not specifically a legal or philosophical one. Seems like you cut him off so you didn't hear the end of that sentence.

[Seethi_C]

Saying that defining terms is pointless is about the dumbest thing i’ve heard David say. It’s basically impossible to have meaningful discussion if each side is operating on a different definition.

[SevenOfNineteen]

USA: Ketanji Brown Jackson is relatively leftist.
Europe: 😂

[Nosferatu]

At what point in the last 10 years did democrats stop knowing what a woman is? I was a democrat pre 2020, and I don't remember not knowing what a woman was....