IFT-1 vs IFT-2 vs IFT-3 - A Comparison

preview_player
Показать описание
Thanks for watching!

Browse our online store!

Support us on Patreon and get special perks!

Other ways you can support:
Cashapp - $LabPadre
Venmo - @LabPadre
BitCoin Wallet: bc1q7w0932yn2xk9ympkm2uzn28pnm90qzmplr4yew

Patreon Elite/Royalty Crew: Tim Dodd, Eric Beavers, Marcus House, Matt Lowne, Zack Golden, Colin Smith, Steve Roberts, Azatht, Stumpy, Peter Lehrack, Eagle Eye Chuck, Gort, Robert Castle, Seth Count, Unreal Patch, Wil Schweitzer
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

It’s incredible IFT-1 got as far as it did. It’s actually quite impressive engineering that held it together for so long.

jess
Автор

Damn IFT 1 looked like an amateur's attempt compared to IFT 3, what a progress

rador
Автор

Wow you really can see how much an effect of just 3 missing engines made it ascend slower.

Howtopaintstuff
Автор

Comparing it like this; you can really feel the progress

SjMk.
Автор

It’s amazing seeing how each new flight improved upon the last. Can’t wait for IFT-4! Thank you Lab!

PeterJCalkins
Автор

Waiting to see the comparison with IFT-4

giovannilacerda
Автор

That sucker was screaming off of the launch pad this time! 😮

lyricbread
Автор

Gonna need a bigger monitor soon as the flights eventually increase.

iamaduckquack
Автор

Truly amazing seeing it side by side. IFT-1 went way further than I expected, obviously partly due to it not self destruct properly. IFT-2's second stage was picture perfect until the end, when you compare it to IFT-3. I can't wait to see what IFT-4 brings to the table.

JamesDooley
Автор

It's so funny (and I noticed it only now) that booster during IFT 1 survived longer that during IFT 2

MKJ
Автор

What a brilliant illustration of just how far SpaceX has come in just three test flights. Awesome!!!

danswan
Автор

I work with the company, that t-minus 2 seconds on IFT-3 with the ignition of that booster is something I’ll never forget.

AmericanCrusader
Автор

all huge improvements, especially flight 2

thefowlyetti
Автор

IFT-3 looks 30-40 km/h slower compared with IFT-2, but considering that pad damage after it is basically non-existent - I think that sacrificing some speed was totally worth it👏

MikoDnst
Автор

That's why they call it a blast off.
Thanks, Lab.

FrankBenlin
Автор

Every IFT gave new data from a flight regime never experienced by Starship and Superheavy, making it easy to eliminate those ways to fail. And once you eliminate the ways to fail, you have success.

Sir_Uncle_Ned
Автор

Thanks Lewis. Interesting to see the drastic improvements from launch to launch. It will be spectacular to see those Booster stages landing reliably.

RWBHere
Автор

Cool comparo, def didn't realize how much longer B7 lived compared to B9.

HagarTheHorrible
Автор

Amazing progress. IFT-3 launch was, dare i say, almost underwhelming by comparison. 😲
Thats how slick it was. It just yeeted off the pad! 😄

IFT-1 will remain my favourite due to the sheer sketchiness of it! 😄
It was wild. Barely got off the pad, wrecked the pad, was losing engines all the way up, didn't stage, fts didn't kill it, then it spun out of control while its engines kept burning until it just collapsed. It was epic!
🤣

olliea
Автор

What a giant gift to humanity Go Raptors Go ❤

wingssoon
visit shbcf.ru