Why can't other denominations receive the Eucharist? | What Catholics Believe

preview_player
Показать описание
Ever wondered why Christians of different denominations can't receive Holy Communion together? Join us as we explore the theological reasons behind this practice. I Discover why alignment with the Church's teachings, particularly on Christ's real presence in the Eucharist, and formal communion through baptism are essential prerequisites for receiving Holy Communion. Subscribe and hit the notification bell to stay informed on more discussions like this!

#Catholic #theEucharist #eucharisticrevival #eucharisticcongress #communion #catholicfaith

▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
FIND ANSWERS ON SOCIAL:
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬

Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Simply Beautiful! Thank you for sharing and thanks be to God!

JonOchoa
Автор

Simply put… if you are Christian but you think the bread and wine after being prayed over are still a symbolic representation of Christ instead of the body and blood of Christ transubstantiated, then as Christians we are not in communion because the perception of the Eucharist is vastly different. It’s not exclusionary to have the airs of superiority, moreover, it’s protecting that which the Catholic Church knows and believes is sacred.

A silly way to think about it is like this: if you know your friend doesn’t appreciate sashimi… don’t invite them to a sushi restaurant…they won’t value or appreciate the experience. Christians are of course welcomed into Catholic spaces as our brothers and sisters; and out of respect they should acknowledge our differences in tradition by crossing their arms to show they respect the Eucharist without partaking and receive a blessing instead. I wouldn’t take communion at a Protestant church because I don’t believe the blood and the body are symbolic. It’s straightforward and nothing to quarrel over or feel embittered about.

-LadyFawn-
Автор

I believe you should send this to Pope Francis.

kathleenfrancis
Автор

No, I believe in The Holy Father Bishop of Rome! Except I believe in this one, not in the previous one... Long story.

ValentinBrutusBura
Автор

Cult like exclusiveness mentality right there.

TexasHoosier
Автор

if Jesus instituted it as "communion" this would be a great argument.

dursty
Автор

Does that mean an Anglcian who was baptized as a baby and confirmed as an adult can receive communion at a Catholic mass. They check all the qualities of being in communion with God and the rest of the body, atleast from what I understand.

callumarendse
Автор

You make no sense at all so a person who wants to be baptized as a Catholic still cannot receive communion? You make zero sense

TheManofsorrows
Автор

If the Catholics reckon communion means you are having communion with the Catholic religious institution then you shouldn't want to. Our communion is with Christ, not a political institution especially one that despises Christ, the actual leader of the church.

stephenking
Автор

if that's what it means to have communion in the ROman catholic church then any scriptural believer in Christ wouldn't want to partake. The Roman political religious institution and the concept of papact has nothing to do with the gospel or respecting Christ. We have faith in Christ, not in religious politics. There is one church and one leader. That leader is Christ, not some fake dictator and sexual oppressor in Rome.

stephenking