THIS IS A MISTAKE... | Fantasy Premier League Tips 2024/25

━━━━━━━━━━━━━
In this video I go through some potential mistakes people in the FPL Community are making according to YOU.
━━━━━━━━━━━━━
━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Join the Let's Talk FPL mini-league:

Code 👉 eca35f
━━━━━━━━━━━━━
Previous FPL Finishes:

2023/24 - 44,067
2022/23 - 35,711
2021/22 - 9,975
2020/21 - 1,294
2019/20 - 162,555
2018/19 - 12,731
2017/18 - 21,436
2016/17 - 4,935
2015/16 - 92,554
2014/15 - 8,492
2013/14 - 104,345
2012/13 - 15,557
2011/12 - 10,463
2010/11 - 20,698
━━━━━━━━━━━━━
► Lets Talk FPL League winners

🏆 2023/24 - Sundeep Jaswal
🏆 2022/23 - Chris Glover
🏆 2021/22 - Jamie Pigott
🏆 2020/21 - Craig Williams
🏆 2019/20 - Sivert Gjertsås
🏆 2018/19 - Domagoj Fekonja
🏆 2017/18 - Jamal Rice
🏆 2016/17 - Jamie Davern
━━━━━━━━━━━━━
00:00 Intro
00:25 Covering Palmer with Nkunku
02:44 Worrying about fixtures
04:02 Fantasy Football Hub
04:49 Late returners
08:27 Premium Price Points
11:30 Wasting money on subs
13:53 Focusing on defender clean sheets
15:33 Overthinking differentials
17:27 Ignoring Arsenal
20:52 Pre-Season, Risky players, Team Bias
━━━━━━━━━━━━━
━━━━━━━━━━━━━
#FPL #FantasyPremierLeague #PremierLeague

[ExpectFPL]

Biggest mistake was reinstalling the app for another season of pain, stress and broken friendships

[cosminalexa]

Andy is going deeper and deeper into the YouTube algorithm with such titles and thumbnails 😂 It clearly works as the video "I got it wrong" has a lot more views than others

[bigfudge]

Another mistake is copying what FPL Youtubers do, be your own person and make your own decisions. You won't have fun if you allow someone else to dictate every decision you make.

[lalex]

I kind of agree that the players are more important than the fixtures. I remember having Bowen at the start of last season and he scored in his first 6 consecutive away games even with his hard fixtures, including goals at Anfield and Villa. I wouldn't say fixtures don't matter though

[TurtleFPL]

Not sure how I feel about this classic YouTube click bait type title and thumbnail... But I guess if it works, it works

[CantMuffin]

Loving the clickbait lately. Get your money Andy

[plante]

I love these kind of videos. Show me the broader aspects of the thought process. Thanks.

[wordtouremother]

*just want it known that I would have watched this anyway without the click-baity headline

[FPL_Tiggy]

Great Video, new insights . Not sure why people are complaining about click bait... The title makes total sense.. Asked the FPL community What mistakes are people making with their squads / player selections for Game week 1.. (I Was waiting for this one) 😊 Then goes through them and applies logic to different scenarios that are relevant to different chip strategy… Thumbnails dont care as I watch all of your videos

[ChrisBrunger]

I thought I had my team nailed. But some more tinkering and now have a 99% rating (didn't think it would go so high). Anyway, ratings are one thing, what actually happens on the field is something else

[suzandben]

"What's going on andy, my name is Everyone"

[yoursernestly]

I think “safe” can also be interpreted as points variance. A “safe player” is one who will probably score 4-8 points, while a risky pick can be a player who scores 1-15 for example.

[XPSftw]

I'm seriously concerned Salah is a massive trap given how he played towards the end of last season. 12.5 is a lot of money, and the big draw to him is the great fixtures. We have written off Arsenal due to the fixtures. A lot of focus on fixtures...

[Thunder.Elephant]

I think more safe picks N safe stratetegy for above GW30😊

[adking]

I won't go near Palmer as the price doesn't offer any value at all, but I don't quite agree that attacking coverage isn't a thing. If you're considering a player like Palmer, part of that also includes considering the team he plays for and presumably if you're considering Palmer you're backing Chelsea's attack as a whole to score goals.

Palmer's price point makes him difficult to fit in, and I don't think it's bad management to consider the other nailed attackers if you think their attack is going to do well. If Palmer goes and gets 2 goals and an assist, 9 times out of 10 there are going to be 3 other attacking returns within that and they'll come from others in his team. It's impossible to predict things perfectly and I do think there's a case to be made for spreading risk across teams, especially early on - so if you already have coverage from a team I would tend to steer towards covering a different one to spread the risk if it's a close decision.

Obviously if you're absolutely certain that Chelsea are going to be rubbish and Newcastle and Palace are going to start the season on fire then don't bother covering Chelsea attack - but who is ever going to be that certain?

[wavehuntersjapan]

I dont know, ……I just cant decide about being indecisive :)

[delnero]

So I'm 95% on this lewin-haaland-isak..I'm just waiting to see the today friendly for liverpool to be sure about szobo..0.5 in the bank to move around when needed..garnacho is a big desicion but rotation wise i like this team more

[manforalifetime]

Thoughts on my current team of

Pickford, valdimarsson

Gvardiol, pedro porro, trent, faes, barco

Eze, saka, salah, Gordon

Muniz, havertz, isak

Dabbled with 4.5 keeper and munoz instead of porro then keeping the money in the bank for a late palmer swap from saka but enjoy this balance more

[LulaJake]

We could learn from this time last season where everyone thought Jackson at Chelski was gonna be amazing. Or the year before where everyone hyped up Lukaku at Chelski.

[bmcd]

Basket case owners, a manager without Premier League experience and Palmer overpriced. The mistake would be to believe that Chelsea players are going to have successful seasons and that the manager will still be in place next year.