Are transwomen women? Vaush debate clip

preview_player
Показать описание
I'm currently working on the full version of this.
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Langauge evolves, is this really a hard concept to understand?

smonarch
Автор

Vaush really thinks that just by re-defining crap reality is just gonna take another form lol.

ElDrHouse
Автор

He appeals to utilitarianism's utility (and does it very badly, as he's a consequentialist, not a utilitarian) and then confuses his audience of teenage idiots that going between real utility (coherent definitions) and consequentialists utility (happiness) are the same thing.

It's a simple trick.

eleccy
Автор

F'ckin Vaush. He thinks Mexicans drink a 90s bubblegum-pop band to quench thirst.

lavlmoon
Автор

The very useful and effective UtiLity in reforming the language so you can never tell what anyone actually means when they speak.

StuntedSlime
Автор

Looking forward to your Vaush vid! Love your sense of humor and it’s so needed in debates like this.

vess
Автор

I don't know about philosophy, but I'm thinking you know how some talk about Occam's razor for bad science. What if there was something like that for bad reasoning. Like the deuterium bit, it was clever yet idiotic. What does the obscure findings by 20th century scientists of rare isotopes have any relevance to the primordial liquid substance of the planet of all time?

ntrotdolcntro
Автор

He should check the utility of the phrase “tanking a debate”. With himself if you watch the video.

littlecatfeet
Автор

Language just changes. It’s why Chaucer is so hard to read
And why Shakespeare is boring.

phillgornall
welcome to shbcf.ru