Fractal Audio FM3 vs Neural DSP Plugins

preview_player
Показать описание
Рекомендации по теме
Комментарии
Автор

Difference is in the price, they both sound amazing

KUM
Автор

How the F have you only got 46 (now 47) subscribers? Your playing is amazing. They both sound good, but the FM3 sounds better to me. Clearer tones.

dver
Автор

Can you post details of your FM3 presets? Sounds great!

jeffreydunning
Автор

wow man, holy shit your technique is mad clean nice demo!

combatwombatt
Автор

Reminds me Animals as Leader. What audio interface and impedance setting was used to record neural?

DerrenTube
Автор

Difference is that you can play fm3 without pc on stage has buttons etc etc.. Different machines

fabiol.
Автор

So sick man! This reminds me of why I with an fm9 haha. Great playing!

jasonwright
Автор

Are you using fm3 as interface to run neural?

joaov
Автор

any tip for the sounds of fm3 for me? I just bought the fractal! thank u

riccardopocci
Автор

They sound about the same. Neural failed by not including their clearly exceptional plug-ins in their flagship QC. For 99.999% of players, including many pro's, the new FM9 is all you would ever need. It have more DSP power and floor switches than the FM3- all in one package. It also a better editor than the FM3. It is very close to Fractals flagship product (almost $3k w/needed controllers and extras), the AxeFX III. You can run nearly all the same patches between the FM9 and AxeFXIII. By contrast this is not true at all with the FM3.

If you simply need some outstanding PI's for playing at home e.g., jamming to backing tracks, Neural makes the best IMO. If I needed a very solid floor unit (I do), I would get on the FM9 waitlist (I did- 1 years ago and counting.) 😪

MOAB-UT
Автор

Nice! Excellent picking dynamics man. Personally I can't get over the Neural stuff. The FM3 is starting to sound a bit out dated in my ears. ;)

waydesworld